A new approach for emergency department performance positioning: The quality‐efficiency matrix

Background The crowding of emergency departments (EDs) is one of the major poor‐quality factors for patients. Because of this, measuring ED performance in Healthcare Systems is a difficult but an important task needed to enhance quality and efficiency. Purpose (i) Development of a tool to observe and evaluate performance measurement, analysing two critical variables (quality and efficiency), verifying the change in performance due to the implementation of a new organizational model; (ii) the implementation of the tool in two EDs with comparable annual volumes of activity in the Italian context. Methods A literature review on ED performance was conducted in order to identify acknowledged performance measurements used in this context that can be used in the development of a tool for the evaluation of EDs' performance. The goal is to have a matrix that is easily understood and that shows a simple relationship between quality and efficiency. This was possible by setting up a method that translates the ED annual performance data (in this case the data related to year 2018) into a graph with benchmarking purposes, also including an actual situation (AS‐IS) view as compared to a TO‐BE situation (i.e., before and after an organizational change occurred). Results Two real EDs were compared and their results depicted; they can be easily related with each other to benchmark healthcare organisations. More precisely, a comparison can be used for two main tasks: ‐ identifying different strategic areas and observing the positioning of a health organization at any given moment in time, seeing where it stands among its competitors in a matrix; ‐ knowing how to best allocate available resources and where to divert investment. Results show that the tool depicts the situation of EDs, with a clear indication of how performance increases or decreases in the case of AS‐IS and TO‐BE evaluation, and also offers a quick understanding of the benchmarked EDs' situations. Practice Implications The results can be shown on a graph that summarises the performance change for the AS‐IS versus TO‐BE conditions. This can be a useful tool for the ED and for the hospital decision makers, as it allows for an observation of performance by analysing two critical variables: the quality and the efficiency of the service provided. The former represents customer satisfaction, which in this work is the combination of two factors (i.e., appropriateness of assigning the triage code and patient satisfaction), and the latter represents the ED's efficiency in providing emergency care. The tool also helps the organizational changes to be easily evaluated.