IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v36y2021i6p1972-1989.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

'We did everything we could': An account of toxic leadership

Author

Listed:
  • Calum Paton

Abstract

Background The UK government's reckless and incompetent response to Covid‐19 has produced an outcome which is amongst the worst in the world, and arguably the worst in terms of deaths per 100,000 population of major countries (especially when one measures mortality from Covid in terms of cause of death on the death certificate, rather than the UK government's own measure—death of a tested individual within 28 days of testing). This article updates my initial analysis in this journal over a year ago, and traces the negligent and shambolic policy‐making, and supine official scientific advice, which has led to such a dismal outcome. Methods It does so by examining the policies and approach of the UK government from the begining of the pandemic (in UK terms, January 2020) up to June 2021. All relevant declarations, speeches, decisions, public interviews and policies were noted on a daily basis, examined and critically assessed—along with daily data and information over the whole period on Covid's threat to, and spread across, the UK. Conclusions On three successive occasions, Boris Johnson and his compliant Ministers acted too late and too weakly to prevent avoidable death and illness. At the time of writing the vaccination programme in the UK has been destabilised by the government—yet again—having failed to secure its borders, this time against the Delta variant (Indian mutation) of the virus. Overall, in terms of border control, quarantine, testing, tracing, isolation and timely and enforced lockdown, the government put short‐term, superficial considerations above coherent strategy. It dressed up its incompetence as a superficial libertarianism and defence of the economy, but thereby managed to achieve the worst of all worlds in terms of three egregious failures—appalling health outcomes; (ironically) worse economic damage than countries which took draconian action; and (also ironically) continually recurring restrictions as a result of earlier failure to take strong action to suppress Covid and keep it at bay. Public reaction in England (unlike in Scotland and Wales) to the Johnson government's shenanigans has not been commensurate with that government's level of failure, which sadly reflects a debasement of the political culture in England.

Suggested Citation

  • Calum Paton, 2021. "'We did everything we could': An account of toxic leadership," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(6), pages 1972-1989, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:36:y:2021:i:6:p:1972-1989
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3264
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3264?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Calum Paton, 2020. "Insouciance and inexperience: A deadly combination when dealing with COVID‐19," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(5), pages 983-987, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tiago Correia & Karen Willis, 2022. "Applying critical realism to the COVID‐19 pandemic to improve management of future public health crises," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 599-603, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Issam Nessaibia & Dafne Siciliano & Abdelkrim Tahraoui, 2020. "Why nobody discusses the adverse psychiatric effects of chloroquine in case it might become the future treatment against COVID‐19?," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(6), pages 1311-1313, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:36:y:2021:i:6:p:1972-1989. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.