IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v36y2021i5p1666-1684.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors affecting the quality of diagnosis coding data with a triangulation view: A qualitative study

Author

Listed:
  • Nafiseh Hosseini
  • Khalil Kimiafar
  • Sayyed Mostafa Mostafavi
  • Behzad Kiani
  • Kazem Zendehdel
  • Armin Zareiyan
  • Saeid Eslami

Abstract

Objective The most important challenge in utilizing medical record codes is the quality of coding data. The present study aims to investigate factors affecting the quality of diagnosis coding from different aspects covering different stakeholders in a multi‐dimensional approach. Methods First, we used Conventional Content Analysis to maximally gather all effective factors. As such, semi‐structured interviews were conducted with medical record coders (N = 32) at the referral hospitals in Mashhad, Iran. Second, 86 hospital staff members from 25 provinces were surveyed using a web‐based questionnaire. Finally, a focus group discussion was conducted among coders (N = 18) in different hospitals across the country. Results In general, the barriers to quality of inpatient record coding can be classified into three categories: (I) physician‐related, (II) coder‐related, and (III) managerial, financial and administrative factors. Conclusion A triangulation view (related to coders, physicians as well as managerial, financial and administrative dimensions) could be used to identify the barriers affecting the quality of diagnosis coding data. The results of this study may help policymakers in development and implementation of appropriate strategies and effective interventions to improve the quality of clinical coding.

Suggested Citation

  • Nafiseh Hosseini & Khalil Kimiafar & Sayyed Mostafa Mostafavi & Behzad Kiani & Kazem Zendehdel & Armin Zareiyan & Saeid Eslami, 2021. "Factors affecting the quality of diagnosis coding data with a triangulation view: A qualitative study," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 1666-1684, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:36:y:2021:i:5:p:1666-1684
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.3254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3254
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.3254?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:36:y:2021:i:5:p:1666-1684. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.