IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v34y2019i2pe1236-e1246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using machine‐learning methods to support health‐care professionals in making admission decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Li Luo
  • Jialing Li
  • Chuang Liu
  • Wenwu Shen

Abstract

Background Large tertiary hospitals usually face long waiting lines; patients who want to receive hospitalization need to be screened in advance. The patient admission screening process involves a health‐care professional ranking patients by analyzing registration information. Objective The purpose of this study was to develop a machine‐learning approach to screening, using historical data and the experience of health‐care professionals to develop a set of screening rules to help health‐care professionals prioritize patient needs automatically. Methods We used five machine‐learning methods to sequence and predict elective patients: logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), gradient‐boosting decision tree (GBDT), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and an ensemble model of the four models. Results The results indicate that all of the five models showed a good prioritization performance with high predictive values. In particular, XGBoost had the best predictive performance compared with others in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with the AUC values of LR, RF, GBDT, XGBoost, and the ensemble model being 0.881, 0.816, 0.820, 0.901, and 0.897, respectively. Conclusion The results reported here indicate that machine‐learning techniques can be valuable for automating the screening process. Our model can assist health‐care professionals in automatically evaluating less complex cases by identifying important factors affecting patient admission.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Luo & Jialing Li & Chuang Liu & Wenwu Shen, 2019. "Using machine‐learning methods to support health‐care professionals in making admission decisions," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 1236-1246, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:34:y:2019:i:2:p:e1236-e1246
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2769
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.2769?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jens Kjølseth Møller & Martin Sørensen & Christian Hardahl, 2021. "Prediction of risk of acquiring urinary tract infection during hospital stay based on machine-learning: A retrospective cohort study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Esra Zihni & Vince Istvan Madai & Michelle Livne & Ivana Galinovic & Ahmed A Khalil & Jochen B Fiebach & Dietmar Frey, 2020. "Opening the black box of artificial intelligence for clinical decision support: A study predicting stroke outcome," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Isabel Marques & Zélia Serrasqueiro & Fernanda Nogueira, 2021. "Managers’ Competences in Private Hospitals for Investment Decisions during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:34:y:2019:i:2:p:e1236-e1246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.