IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v34y2019i2p773-779.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient safety walkrounds; 5 years of experience in a developing country

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Saadati
  • Mahdi Nouri
  • Ramin Rezapour

Abstract

Objective Patient safety walkround (PSWR) is an appropriate technique for senior managers' participation and collaboration with frontline staff to promote safety culture in hospitals. This study was conducted to assess the 5‐year PSWR experience in Shahid Mahallati Hospital in Tabriz, Iran. Methods This was a triangulated cross‐sectional study. All documents, instructions, reports, action plans, protocols, and verbal feedbacks on PSWRs were reviewed from 2013 to 2017. Data were extracted using goal‐driven extraction form and analyzed using Excel 2016 software. Results A total of 174 90‐minute PSWRs were conducted during the study period, and 1372 safety issues were identified. Work environment factors (32.5%), organization and management (18.14%), and tasks (18.07%) were the most frequent identified issues, respectively. About 75.5% of the issues were resolved through corrective interventions implementation. Conclusions PSWRs provide a great opportunity to identify and resolve the safety issues in the hospitals. Senior managers' participation and their support of staffs opinions and innovations were reinforced through PSWRs. Moreover, it creates mutual trust and safety responsiveness at all organizational levels in the hospital.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Saadati & Mahdi Nouri & Ramin Rezapour, 2019. "Patient safety walkrounds; 5 years of experience in a developing country," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 773-779, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:34:y:2019:i:2:p:773-779
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2734
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.2734?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:34:y:2019:i:2:p:773-779. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.