IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v34y2019i2p521-533.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post‐stroke ankle‐foot orthoses: Examining referral trends in the Scottish multi‐disciplinary team

Author

Listed:
  • Eileen Morrow
  • Roy Bowers

Abstract

Purpose As per the Best Practice Statement: Use of Ankle‐Foot Orthoses Following Stroke (BPS), members of the stroke multidisciplinary team should refer stroke patients with mobility problems to orthotics. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to (1) assess awareness of the BPS; (2) assess referral patterns and trends; and (3) identify barriers to referral to the Orthotic Service in Scotland. Methods An online survey of the stroke MDT, working in Scotland, whose current role involves work with stroke patients. A survey was distributed via the Scottish Stroke Allied Health Professionals Forum, Scottish Stroke Nurses Forum, British Association of Stroke Physicians, and Scottish Stroke Managed Clinical Networks. Results Statistically significant association was found between: Awareness of BPS and NHS Board Area; Profession and whether clinicians have referred to orthotics; Confidence in assessment criteria and profession; Referral to departments other than Orthotics and profession. Conclusion Physiotherapists are relied upon by members of the Stroke MDT to identify mobility problems and refer to Orthotics. The BPS should be re‐disseminated, particularly to the East of Scotland and GPs, to improve awareness of referral criteria. Reduced waiting list times and joint physiotherapist‐orthotist clinics may reduce referral barriers to the Orthotic Service.

Suggested Citation

  • Eileen Morrow & Roy Bowers, 2019. "Post‐stroke ankle‐foot orthoses: Examining referral trends in the Scottish multi‐disciplinary team," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 521-533, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:34:y:2019:i:2:p:521-533
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2713
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.2713?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:34:y:2019:i:2:p:521-533. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.