IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v34y2019i1pe230-e240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of accreditation on nurses' perceptions of quality of care in Iran and its barriers and facilitators

Author

Listed:
  • Nahid Reisi
  • Pouran Raeissi
  • Mobin Sokhanvar
  • Edris Kakemam

Abstract

Background Iran national hospital accreditation was initiated as a government and mandatory program in 2012. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of accreditation on nurses' perceptions of quality of care and to determine those barriers and facilitators needed for effective implementation of accreditation. Methods A cross‐sectional survey conducted in 43 tertiary public hospitals in 5 metropolises, Iran, which successfully passed national accreditation surveys. Participants included nurses with at least 5‐year work experience. Overall response rate was 76%, with 1312 of 1706 valid responses included in the data analysis. A questionnaire was applied using a 5‐point Likert scale ranging from 1 “strongly disagree” to 5 “strongly agree”. In addition, the questionnaire included 2 open‐ended questions allowing the respondent to identify barriers and facilitators to the process of for improving accreditation implementation. The relationship between the quality of results and the independent variables was tested using multiple regression analysis. Results The scales measuring benefits of accreditation had the highest mean score followed by strategic quality planning, education and training, and staff involvement. Regression analysis indicated that leadership, commitment, and support; education and training; rewards and recognition; and staff involvement were factors affecting quality results. Barriers encountered included financial and capital resources, staff, institutional, and patients. Hospital accreditation has a positive impact on quality of care. Conclusions The findings of this study provide valuable information to policymakers and hospital managers on which to base the process of accreditation and its requirements, and to help reap its benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Nahid Reisi & Pouran Raeissi & Mobin Sokhanvar & Edris Kakemam, 2019. "The impact of accreditation on nurses' perceptions of quality of care in Iran and its barriers and facilitators," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 230-240, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:34:y:2019:i:1:p:e230-e240
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2642
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2642
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.2642?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amira El-Shal & Patricia Cubi-Molla & Mireia Jofre-Bonet, 2021. "Accreditation as a quality-improving policy tool: family planning, maternal health, and child health in Egypt," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(1), pages 115-139, February.
    2. Fatemeh Ghazanfari & Ali Mohammad Mosadeghrad & Ebrahim Jaafari Pooyan & Hossein Mobaraki, 2021. "Iran hospital accreditation standards: challenges and solutions," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 958-975, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:34:y:2019:i:1:p:e230-e240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.