IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v34y2019i1p241-250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing costs of a senior wellness care redesign in group and independent physician practices of an accountable care organization

Author

Listed:
  • Arturo Vargas Bustamante
  • Ana Martinez
  • Jeremy Rich
  • Xiao Chen
  • Hector P. Rodriguez

Abstract

Primary care redesign for older adult patients is currently ongoing in countries with aging populations. One of the main challenges of this type of transformations is how to estimate implementation costs in different types of health care delivery organizations. This study compares start‐up and incremental expenses of implementing a primary care redesign across 2 organization types: integrated group (n = 31) practices and independent practice association (IPA) sites (n = 213). Administrators involved with implementing the redesign completed a cost capture template to quantifying expenses. The potential impact of measurement error, recollection bias, and implementation models across sites and geographic regions was examined in sensitivity analyses. Marginal start‐up and incremental expenses were higher for Group sites ($122‐$328) compared to IPA sites ($31‐$227). Group and IPA sites, however, implemented the redesign with different intensities. According to our analyses, if IPA sites implemented the redesign with the same intensity as Group sites, marginal costs would have been $5 to $13 higher for IPA sites than for Group sites. This study shows how a flexible approach to estimate the cost of a wellness care redesign is needed when the intensity of the transformation differs across 2 different types of health care organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Arturo Vargas Bustamante & Ana Martinez & Jeremy Rich & Xiao Chen & Hector P. Rodriguez, 2019. "Comparing costs of a senior wellness care redesign in group and independent physician practices of an accountable care organization," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 241-250, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:34:y:2019:i:1:p:241-250
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2622
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2622
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.2622?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:34:y:2019:i:1:p:241-250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.