IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v33y2018i4p836-846.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist at a teaching hospital in India and evaluation of the effects on perioperative complications

Author

Listed:
  • Raghavendra Shankar

Abstract

Background The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist was developed to help operating teams reduce the occurrence of patient harm. The Checklist is a simple, practical tool that any surgical team in the world can use to ensure that the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative steps that have been shown to benefit patients are undertaken in a timely and efficient way. Methods This study was carried out at Rajarajeswari Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, India, to study the effects of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist on mortality and morbidity in surgical patients, to identify the potential problems in the long‐term implementation of the same, and to document the complications in patients undergoing a major surgery during the study period. Data collection followed patients prospectively until discharge or for 30 days, whichever came first, for complications and death. Results There were a total of 73 complications during the period of the study (4.1%). Of these, more than half (44) were surgical wound infections. The proportion of patients who received prophylactic antibiotics was 100% during the period of the study and the checklist identified a deficit and corrected the same in 27 patients. Conclusions The checklist was successfully implemented in the said hospital, and the appropriate processes were studied. The use of the checklist was successful in drawing the attention of the personnel to the issue of patient safety, its magnitude, and the appropriate steps to be taken in this regard. The number of omissions in the operation rooms was significantly reduced.

Suggested Citation

  • Raghavendra Shankar, 2018. "Implementation of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist at a teaching hospital in India and evaluation of the effects on perioperative complications," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 836-846, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:33:y:2018:i:4:p:836-846
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2533
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.2533?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:33:y:2018:i:4:p:836-846. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.