IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijhplm/v33y2018i1pe67-e75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The health policy pendulum: Cost control vs activity growth

Author

Listed:
  • Trond Tjerbo
  • Terje P. Hagen

Abstract

Background Cost containment is a major policy challenge and one of the key drivers of health care reform. In this article, we focus on the role cost control has played as a reform driver in the Norwegian hospital sector between 1980 and 2014. Methods We use data on aggregate expenditure as well as on activity changes from year to year. We also use qualitative data for illustrative purposes. Results We identify 4 phases in the period 1980 to 2014: two where activity increases have dominated the agenda and 2 where cost control has been emphasized. The desire to either increase activity or improve cost control has been important reform drivers. Conclusion Cost control has been a major reform motivator in the period, and some of the policies aimed towards achieving cost control have been successful. But as cost control is achieved, waiting lists and popular dissatisfaction increase and new policies are implemented to increase activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Trond Tjerbo & Terje P. Hagen, 2018. "The health policy pendulum: Cost control vs activity growth," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 67-75, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:33:y:2018:i:1:p:e67-e75
    DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2407
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hpm.2407?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijhplm:v:33:y:2018:i:1:p:e67-e75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0749-6753 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.