IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/growch/v57y2026i2ne70142.html

Territorial Patterns in Public Support for Knowledge Intensive Sector: An Urban‐Rural Gradient in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Mempel‐Śnieżyk
  • Katarzyna Miszczak

Abstract

This paper investigates how local government support for knowledge‐intensive sector (KIS) firms varies across rural, urban‐rural, and urban municipalities in Poland. Drawing on original survey data, we apply non‐parametric tests and OLS regression to assess territorial differences in n firms' evaluations of innovation‐oriented policies. Results indicate a clear urban–rural gradient: urban municipalities receive more positive assessments, while urban–rural municipalities align more closely with rural areas. Digital infrastructure is assessed most positively, while human capital support receives the weakest evaluations. Findings highlight the need for territorially differentiated policies better aligned with the needs of KIS firms. The study contributes to the literature on territorial inequalities and local governance by showing how municipality type is associated with differences in firms' perceptions of local support.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Mempel‐Śnieżyk & Katarzyna Miszczak, 2026. "Territorial Patterns in Public Support for Knowledge Intensive Sector: An Urban‐Rural Gradient in Poland," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(2), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:57:y:2026:i:2:n:e70142
    DOI: 10.1111/grow.70142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.70142
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/grow.70142?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Todtling, Franz & Trippl, Michaela, 2005. "One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 1203-1219, October.
    2. David Doloreux & Richard Shearmur, 2010. "Exploring and comparing innovation patterns across different knowledge intensive business services," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(7), pages 605-625.
    3. Konrad Szczukiewicz & Marek Makowiec, 2021. "Characteristics and Specificities of Local Innovation Accelerators: A Case of Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Si Ying Tan & Araz Taeihagh, 2020. "Smart City Governance in Developing Countries: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-29, January.
    5. Roberta Capello & Henning Kroll, 2016. "From theory to practice in smart specialization strategy: emerging limits and possible future trajectories," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(8), pages 1393-1406, August.
    6. Tomasz Wołowiec & Tomasz Skica, 2013. "The Instruments of Stimulating Entrepreneurship by Local Government Units (Lgu’S)," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 127-146, January.
    7. Philip McCann & Raquel Ortega-Argil�s, 2015. "Smart Specialization, Regional Growth and Applications to European Union Cohesion Policy," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(8), pages 1291-1302, August.
    8. Mieczyslaw Adamowicz & Aldona Machla, 2016. "Small And Medium Enterprises And The Support Policy Of Local Government," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 7(3), pages 405-437, September.
    9. Alberto Tejero & Victor Rodriguez-Doncel & Ivan Pau, 2020. "Knowledge Graphs for Innovation Ecosystems," Papers 2001.08615, arXiv.org.
    10. Markus Grillitsch & Bjørn Asheim & Michaela Trippl, 2018. "Unrelated knowledge combinations: the unexplored potential for regional industrial path development," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 11(2), pages 257-274.
    11. Acs,Zoltan J. & Armington,Catherine, 2011. "Entrepreneurship, Geography, and American Economic Growth," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107402539.
    12. Małgorzata Godlewska & Sylwia Morawska, 2020. "Development of local and regional entrepreneurship – which institutions matter? Evidence from Poland," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 1017-1035, January.
    13. Zoltán J. Ács & Erkko Autio & László Szerb, 2015. "National Systems of Entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications," Chapters, in: Global Entrepreneurship, Institutions and Incentives, chapter 28, pages 523-541, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Tobias Ketterer, 2020. "Institutional change and the development of lagging regions in Europe," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(7), pages 974-986, July.
    15. Diamantopoulos, Adamantios & Riefler, Petra & Roth, Katharina P., 2008. "Advancing formative measurement models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(12), pages 1203-1218, December.
    16. Asheim, Bjorn T. & Coenen, Lars, 2005. "Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 1173-1190, October.
    17. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3:p:367-385 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Małgorzata Godlewska & Tomasz Pilewicz, 2022. "Entrepreneurial activities of local governments in their investment attractiveness context – evidence from Poland," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(3), pages 590-614, May.
    19. Tomasz Skica & Jacek Rodzinka & Elzbieta Ociepa-Kicinska, 2021. "Organizational Forms of Entrepreneurship Support: A Case Study," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3 - Part ), pages 367-385.
    20. Paweł Charasz & Jan P Vogler, 2021. "Does EU funding improve local state capacity? Evidence from Polish municipalities," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(3), pages 446-471, September.
    21. Jarvis, Cheryl Burke & MacKenzie, Scott B & Podsakoff, Philip M, 2003. "A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(2), pages 199-218, September.
    22. Odysseas Moschidis & Vasileios Ismyrlis, 2018. "Citizens' Participation in Local Economic Development and Administration: An Exploratory Statistical Analysis," South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, Association of Economic Universities of South and Eastern Europe and the Black Sea Region, vol. 16(1), pages 35-54.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ron Boschma, 2021. "Designing Smart Specialization Policy: relatedness, unrelatedness, or what?," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2128, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Sep 2021.
    2. Francesco Molica & Francesco Cappellano & Teemu Makkonen, 2025. "Re-thinking Regional Innovation Systems in the age of de-globalization," Working Papers TIMES² 2025-080, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    3. Ana María Bartolome & Teresa Briz & Beatriz Urbano, 2026. "Developing Sustainable Urban Agriculture in Research and Innovation Smart Specialisation Strategy to Implement the Quintuple Helix," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 2615-2627, April.
    4. László Szerb & Raquel Ortega‐Argilés & Zoltan J. Acs & Éva Komlósi, 2020. "Optimizing entrepreneurial development processes for smart specialization in the European Union," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(5), pages 1413-1457, October.
    5. Barbero, Javier & Diukanova, Olga & Gianelle, Carlo & Salotti, Simone & Santoalha, Artur, 2024. "Technologically related diversification: One size does not fit all European regions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    6. Ron Boschma, 2022. "Evolutionary Economic Geography and Policy," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2220, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Oct 2022.
    7. Shvets, Nataliia & Shevtsova, Hanna & Pidorycheva, Iryna & Prokopenko, Olha & Maslosh, Olha, . "Sustainable development of agriculture based on the smart specialisation approach: cases of the Central and Eastern European countries," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(01).
    8. Magro, Edurne & Wilson, James R., 2019. "Policy-mix evaluation: Governance challenges from new place-based innovation policies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(10).
    9. Anna Mempel-Śnieżyk & Szymon Wrześniowski, 2024. "Exploring the nexus between public sector entrepreneurial orientation and local entrepreneurship: A Polish local government example," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 39(5-6), pages 231-252, September.
    10. Maximilian Benner, 2019. "Smart specialisation and institutional context: What does it mean for path development?," PEGIS geo-disc-2019_05, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    11. Jason Deegan & Tom Broekel & Rune Dahl Fitjar, 2021. "Searching through the Haystack:The Relatedness and Complexity of Priorities in Smart Specialization Strategies," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 97(5), pages 497-520, October.
    12. Yijia Chen & Robert Hassink, 2019. "Multi-scalar knowledge bases for new regional industrial path development: Toward a typology," PEGIS geo-disc-2019_10, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    13. Pierre-Alexandre Balland & Ron Boschma & Joan Crespo & David L. Rigby, 2017. "Smart Specialization policy in the EU: Relatedness, Knowledge Complexity and Regional Diversification," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1717, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jul 2017.
    14. Biagi, Bianca & Brandano, Maria Giovanna & Ortega-Argiles, Raquel, 2021. "Smart specialisation and tourism: Understanding the priority choices in EU regions," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    15. Evgeniy Kutsenko & Ekaterina Islankina & Alexey Kindras, 2018. "Smart by Oneself? An Analysis of Russian Regional Innovation Strategies within the RIS3 Framework," Foresight and STI Governance, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 25-45.
    16. Pedro López-Rubio & Norat Roig-Tierno & Alicia Mas-Tur, 2020. "Regional innovation system research trends: toward knowledge management and entrepreneurial ecosystems," International Journal of Quality Innovation, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, December.
    17. Jolly, Suyash & Grillitsch, Markus & Hansen, Teis, 2019. "Agency in regional path development: Towards a bio-economy in Värmland, Sweden," Papers in Innovation Studies 2019/7, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    18. Grillitsch, Markus, 2018. "Place-based entrepreneurship and innovation policy for industrial diversification," Papers in Innovation Studies 2018/3, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    19. Diego D'Adda & Donato Iacobucci & Roberto Palloni, 2020. "Relatedness in the implementation of Smart Specialisation Strategy: a first empirical assessment," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(3), pages 405-425, June.
    20. Cristina Chaminade & Monica Plechero, 2015. "Do Regions Make a Difference? Regional Innovation Systems and Global Innovation Networks in the ICT Industry," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 215-237, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:57:y:2026:i:2:n:e70142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0017-4815 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.