IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/growch/v57y2026i1ne70109.html

High‐Tech Regions as Innovators of Traditional Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Ruoran Liu
  • Joanna Ganning

Abstract

This study investigates whether high‐tech innovation stimulates innovation in traditional fields across US metropolitan regions between 1996 and 2014. Existing theory emphasizes that innovation unfolds differently in high‐tech versus low‐ and medium‐tech industries, while a common view among stakeholders portrays technological progress as a linear shift from traditional to high‐tech fields. Utilizing USPTO patent data and technological classifications, this study examines whether regions strong in high‐tech fields also experience growth in patenting within non‐high‐tech industries. The findings indicate that metropolitan regions with higher levels of high‐tech patenting in 1996–2000 subsequently exhibited more patenting in traditional fields in 2010–2014, with effects varying across industries. The analysis further suggests that regional innovation in traditional fields is predominantly shaped by path dependency, with high‐tech innovation serving a more complementary role. Overall, the study highlights a symbiotic—rather than unidirectional—relationship between traditional and high‐tech innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruoran Liu & Joanna Ganning, 2026. "High‐Tech Regions as Innovators of Traditional Technologies," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:57:y:2026:i:1:n:e70109
    DOI: 10.1111/grow.70109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.70109
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/grow.70109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robertson, Paul L. & Patel, Parimal R., 2007. "New wine in old bottles: Technological diffusion in developed economies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 708-721, June.
    2. Russell Seidle, 2024. "Searching wide or staying close: the relative use of distinct organisational learning types in high and low novelty innovations," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(9), pages 1101-1140, October.
    3. J�rgen Essletzbichler, 2015. "Relatedness, Industrial Branching and Technological Cohesion in US Metropolitan Areas," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(5), pages 752-766, May.
    4. Teis Hansen & Lars Winther & Ronnie Fibæk Hansen, 2014. "Human Capital in Low-Tech Manufacturing: The Geography of the Knowledge Economy in Denmark," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(8), pages 1693-1710, August.
    5. Giovanni Dosi & Christopher Freeman & Richard Nelson & Gerarld Silverberg & Luc Soete (ed.), 1988. "Technical Change and Economic Theory," LEM Book Series, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy, number dosietal-1988.
    6. Adelheid Holl & Catalina Martínez & Clara Casado, 2024. "The Changing Geography of Innovation: Comparing Urban, Suburban and Rural Areas," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), December.
    7. Catherine Beaudry & Thierry Burger-Helmchen & Patrick Cohendet, 2021. "Editorial : Innovation policies and practices within innovation ecosystems," Post-Print hal-03243944, HAL.
    8. Henry Lopez-Vega & Jerker Moodysson, 2023. "Digital Transformation of the Automotive Industry: An Integrating Framework to Analyse Technological Novelty and Breadth," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 67-102, January.
    9. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Wilkie, Callum & Zhang, Min, 2021. "Innovating in “lagging” cities: a comparative exploration of the dynamics of innovation in Chinese cities," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120989, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Mariane Santos Françoso & Ron Boschma & Nicholas Vonortas, 2024. "Regional diversification in Brazil: The role of relatedness and complexity," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), March.
    11. Ash Amin & Patrick Cohendet, 2004. "Architectures of knowledge : Firms, capabilities, and communities," Post-Print hal-00279605, HAL.
    12. Edward L. Glaeser & Naomi Hausman, 2020. "The Spatial Mismatch between Innovation and Joblessness," Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 20(1), pages 233-299.
    13. Petralia, Sergio, 2020. "Mapping general purpose technologies with patent data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(7).
    14. Chris Freeman & Luc Soete, 1997. "The Economics of Industrial Innovation, 3rd Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 3, volume 1, number 0262061953, December.
    15. Heike Mayer, 2011. "Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Second Tier Regions," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 12754.
    16. Sergio Petralia, 2020. "Mapping General Purpose Technologies with Patent Data," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2027, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Jul 2020.
    17. David L. Rigby, 2015. "Technological Relatedness and Knowledge Space: Entry and Exit of US Cities from Patent Classes," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(11), pages 1922-1937, November.
    18. Thorsten Wiechmann & Karina M. Pallagst, 2012. "Urban shrinkage in Germany and the USA: A Comparison of Transformation Patterns and Local Strategies," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 261-280, March.
    19. Zoltán J. Ács & Erkko Autio & László Szerb, 2015. "National Systems of Entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications," Chapters, in: Global Entrepreneurship, Institutions and Incentives, chapter 28, pages 523-541, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. ., 2002. "Introduction to the Case," Chapters, in: Antitrust Abuse in the New Economy, chapter 6, pages 50-88, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    21. Robert M. Solow, 1956. "A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 70(1), pages 65-94.
    22. Catherine Beaudry & Thierry Burger-Helmchen & Patrick Cohendet, 2021. "Editorial: Innovation policies and practices within innovation ecosystems," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(5), pages 535-544, May.
    23. Ron Boschma & Pierre-Alexandre Balland & Dieter Franz Kogler, 2015. "Relatedness and technological change in cities: the rise and fall of technological knowledge in US metropolitan areas from 1981 to 2010," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 24(1), pages 223-250.
    24. Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose & Callum Wilkie, 2019. "Innovating in less developed regions: What drives patenting in the lagging regions of Europe and North America," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1), pages 4-37, March.
    25. Lucas, Robert Jr., 1988. "On the mechanics of economic development," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 3-42, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hidalgo, César A., 2023. "The policy implications of economic complexity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(9).
    2. Kurz Heinz D. & Strohmaier Rita & Knell Mark, 2025. "Technological Change: History, Theory and Measurement. A Brief Account," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2025-03, Joint Research Centre.
    3. Petralia, Sergio & Balland, Pierre-Alexandre & Morrison, Andrea, 2017. "Climbing the ladder of technological development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 956-969.
    4. Pier-Paolo Saviotti & Andreas Pyka¤ & Bogang Jun, 2020. "Diversification, structural change, and economic development," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 1301-1335, November.
    5. Matthias Firgo & Peter Mayerhofer, 2015. "Wissens-Spillovers und regionale Entwicklung - welche strukturpolitische Ausrichtung optimiert des Wachstum?," Working Paper Reihe der AK Wien - Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 144, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik.
    6. Mark Knell & Simone Vannuccini, 2022. "Tools and concepts for understanding disruptive technological change after Schumpeter," Jena Economics Research Papers 2022-005, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    7. Jaewon Lim & Changkeun Lee & Euijune Kim, 2015. "Contributions of human capital investment policy to regional economic growth: an interregional CGE model approach," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 55(2), pages 269-287, December.
    8. Aparicio, Sebastian & Urbano, David & Audretsch, David, 2016. "Institutional factors, opportunity entrepreneurship and economic growth: Panel data evidence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 45-61.
    9. David Rigby, 2012. "The Geography of Knowledge Relatedness and Technological Diversification in U.S. Cities," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1218, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Oct 2012.
    10. Belmartino, Andrea, 2025. "The role of green and non-green relatedness in the development of new green specialisations in Argentinean provinces," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    11. Arnab Bhattacharjee & Eduardo Castro & Chris Jensen-Butler, 2009. "Regional variation in productivity: a study of the Danish economy," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 195-212, June.
    12. Ozor, Jude & Ronde, Patrick & Tung, Sarah & Boyer, James, 2024. "The “Middleground” as a catalyst for the dynamics of innovation in an ecosystem? The case of Eurasanté in Hauts-de-France," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    13. Lars Mewes & Tom Broekel, 2020. "Subsidized to change? The impact of R&D policy on regional technological diversification," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 65(1), pages 221-252, August.
    14. Chiraz Feki & Sirine Mnif, 2016. "Entrepreneurship, Technological Innovation, and Economic Growth: Empirical Analysis of Panel Data," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 7(4), pages 984-999, December.
    15. Melissa Haller & David L. Rigby, 2020. "The geographic evolution of optics technologies in the United States, 1976–2010," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(6), pages 1539-1559, December.
    16. Michael Peneder & Karl Aiginger & Gernot Hutschenreiter & Markus Marterbauer, 2001. "Structural Change and Economic Growth," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 20668.
    17. Nicolò Bellanca, 2025. "Why Development Is Rare: The Functional Architecture of Generative Development," Working Papers - Economics wp2025_23.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    18. Tom Kemeny & Sergio Petralia & Michael Storper, 2025. "Disruptive innovation and spatial inequality," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 2076824-207, December.
    19. Barbero, Javier & Diukanova, Olga & Gianelle, Carlo & Salotti, Simone & Santoalha, Artur, 2024. "Technologically related diversification: One size does not fit all European regions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    20. Mathieu P A Steijn & Pierre-Alexandre Balland & Ron Boschma & David L Rigby, 2023. "Technological diversification of U.S. cities during the great historical crises," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(6), pages 1303-1344.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:57:y:2026:i:1:n:e70109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0017-4815 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.