IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/growch/v57y2026i1ne70087.html

Development of Takeaway Delivery and Urban–Rural Wage Sorting

Author

Listed:
  • Ziming Gao

Abstract

Urban–rural wage disparities are a pervasive phenomenon observed across various countries and regions. This paper examines the impact of takeaway delivery on wage levels, with a particular focus on laborers from distinct urban and rural backgrounds. By integrating data from the Chinese Household Income Project (CHIP) and takeaway delivery agencies, this study conducts sub‐sample regression analyses to explore wage differences attributable to residential location and household registration status. The findings reveal that among the four groups categorized by urban–rural status, only individuals with rural household registration but residing in urban areas experience a statistically significant and positive wage impact. This result remains robust across multiple robustness checks. The urban–rural wage sorting effects are analyzed from two perspectives: First, as a physically demanding form of employment, the development of takeaway delivery contributes to wage increments for rural‐registered laborers. Second, the disparity in access to takeaway delivery related resource between urban and rural areas allows urban residents to benefit more significantly from wage increases. This paper underscores the critical role of government policies in leveraging the development of takeaway delivery to explore rural advantages and address the persistent issue of unbalanced urban–rural development.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziming Gao, 2026. "Development of Takeaway Delivery and Urban–Rural Wage Sorting," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(1), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:57:y:2026:i:1:n:e70087
    DOI: 10.1111/grow.70087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.70087
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/grow.70087?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:57:y:2026:i:1:n:e70087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0017-4815 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.