IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/growch/v56y2025i4ne70078.html

The Effect and Mechanism of Labor Mobility on the Subjective Well‐Being of Urban Native Labor: Empirical Evidence From China

Author

Listed:
  • Jingting Yu
  • Guanghao Wu

Abstract

Existing research on the impact of labor mobility on the welfare of urban native labor has inconsistent findings due to differences in the objective measures of welfare and the relatively homogeneous scale of migration within the samples. We focus on subjective well‐being (SWB) as a comprehensive measure of welfare and select China, characterized by significant disparities in labor mobility across cities, as the sample for a study grounded in externality theory. Empirical results derived from microdata of the 2016 China Labor—force Dynamics Survey and corresponding annual city data show that: (1) The relationship between labor force inflow and the SWB of urban native labor in the host city is significantly a U‐shaped curve. When the inflow of labor reaches 0.44 times the size of the urban native labor, the SWB of the latter will reach its lowest point. (2) The labor force outflow has no significant effect on the SWB of urban native labor who stayed behind in the origin city. (3) Costs of living, employment opportunities, and working hours play a mediating role in the relationship between labor inflow and the SWB of urban native labor in the host city.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingting Yu & Guanghao Wu, 2025. "The Effect and Mechanism of Labor Mobility on the Subjective Well‐Being of Urban Native Labor: Empirical Evidence From China," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(4), December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:56:y:2025:i:4:n:e70078
    DOI: 10.1111/grow.70078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.70078
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/grow.70078?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:56:y:2025:i:4:n:e70078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0017-4815 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.