IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/growch/v56y2025i4ne70072.html

Urban Informality, Housing Insecurity and “Bulldozer Urbanism” in Global South Cities: Evidence From Selected Slum Communities in Accra, Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Reforce Okwei
  • Elmond Bandauko
  • Desmond Adjaison
  • Lina Adeetuk
  • Thelma Akyea
  • Godwin Arku

Abstract

In Accra, state‐led eviction mirrors ongoing processes of socio‐spatial inequality and exclusion. While evictions are rooted in neoliberal ideals, the outcomes of such processes have been particularly devastating for residents of slums and informal settlements. This paper uses Cernea's Risk and Reconstruction Model to examine the impacts of bulldozer urbanism on three selected slum communities in Accra. Bulldozer urbanism is rationalized by municipal authorities as an approach to sanitize urban environments by removing what is perceived as filth, dirt, and a looming environmental hazard. While Cernea's model was valuable in uncovering the multiple impacts of evictions on our study communities, the findings reveal outcomes that extend beyond its scope by situating the findings within the broader discussion of state power, neoliberal governance, and urban dispossession. The paper highlights the urgent need for policymakers to embrace and recognize slums and informal communities as integral contributors rather than obstacles to urban development. Based on the findings, the study advocates for a shift from “bulldozing” to upholding the housing rights of slum dwellers as an important step for realizing just, equitable and inclusive cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Reforce Okwei & Elmond Bandauko & Desmond Adjaison & Lina Adeetuk & Thelma Akyea & Godwin Arku, 2025. "Urban Informality, Housing Insecurity and “Bulldozer Urbanism” in Global South Cities: Evidence From Selected Slum Communities in Accra, Ghana," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(4), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:56:y:2025:i:4:n:e70072
    DOI: 10.1111/grow.70072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.70072
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/grow.70072?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:56:y:2025:i:4:n:e70072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0017-4815 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.