IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/growch/v56y2025i4ne70063.html

Why Is It Possible for China to Reduce Its Dependence on Land Expropriation? An Analysis on the Land‐Expropriation Kuznets Curve

Author

Listed:
  • Yang Liu
  • Siliang Wang

Abstract

Although the growth in developing countries have always been accompanied by large‐scale land expropriation, whether there is a standard relationship between the scale of land expropriation and the stage of economic development remains unclear. This paper aims to explore the practice of land expropriation in China, and while there are polarized views around its role in economic growth, inter‐provincial differences also mean that it is an excellent sample for clarifying the relationship. By exploring the growth coalition consisting of local bureaucracies, central government and peasants within the land‐centered development model, the possible inverted U‐shaped trend of land expropriation scale with economic development is theoretically analyzed, from which hypotheses on the Land‐expropriation Kuznets Curve (LKC) are proposed. Further, using Chinese provincial panel data, the results not only show the invert‐U shaped relationship between economic development and land expropriation and its regional heterogeneity, but also identify four determinants of dependence on land expropriation: internal demands of local bureaucracies to advance urban infrastructure, real estate and manufacturing sectors, horizontal competition among local bureaucracies, vertical supervision by the central government, and external forces from peasants. These conditions combine to expand the scale of land expropriation in the less developed period, leading to the phenomenon of land expropriation dependence. However, with the transformation of China's economic growth and development model, changes in above‐mentioned various conditions have made it possible to reduce land expropriation dependence, and the reduction typically occurs when GDP per capita exceeds 50,000 RMB. This paper provides a new perspective for understanding China's land‐centered development story based on the Growth Machine Theory and generates policy implications for the land management practices in other developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang Liu & Siliang Wang, 2025. "Why Is It Possible for China to Reduce Its Dependence on Land Expropriation? An Analysis on the Land‐Expropriation Kuznets Curve," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(4), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:56:y:2025:i:4:n:e70063
    DOI: 10.1111/grow.70063
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.70063
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/grow.70063?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:56:y:2025:i:4:n:e70063. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0017-4815 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.