IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/growch/v48y2017i4p570-589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Race, Place, and the Persisting Income Divide in the U.S. Southeast, 2000–2014

Author

Listed:
  • Madhuri Sharma

Abstract

Despite economic growth since the recession, the gap between the richest and the poorest segments of the population remains one of the most pressing concerns of contemporary America. This paper uses IR†95/20, IR†80/20, and IR†65/35 ratios to measure the income divides between the richest and the poorest segments in the mid†to†large†sized metropolises of the U.S. Southeast, their variation across ethnicities, and their association with metropolitan level attributes such as diversity, segregation, socio†economic, and other built†environment, and labor characteristics. The income divide ratios serve as the dependent variables whereas principal components along with state†dummy variables serve as the explanatory variables in regressions analyses. The metropolises that are large, diverse, and better educated are the most income†divided whereas those with lower educated people are less divided. Metropolises with larger shares of their labor engaged in primary sectors of economy have higher income divides; this observation also holds true for African Americans and Hispanics. Metropolises that gained in intermixing during 2000–2014 are associated with a lower income divide and vice versa.

Suggested Citation

  • Madhuri Sharma, 2017. "Race, Place, and the Persisting Income Divide in the U.S. Southeast, 2000–2014," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 570-589, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:48:y:2017:i:4:p:570-589
    DOI: 10.1111/grow.12214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12214
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/grow.12214?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:growch:v:48:y:2017:i:4:p:570-589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0017-4815 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.