IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v17y2026is2ps45-s56.html

Does AI Affect the Democratic Conduct of War? Analyzing US and Israeli Military AI Deployment

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandra Russo

Abstract

This study examines how the use of decision‐support military Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems can affect the democratic conduct of warfare. AI can challenge the democratic conduct of warfare by introducing systemic risks such as reduced oversight, opacity, and automation bias. The inquiry focuses on two case studies: US Project Maven and Israeli AI targeting systems. Available reporting and official statements portray the United States as emphasizing procedural oversight, containing AI risks, while investigative reporting on Israel alleges prioritization of speed, looser scrutiny and higher tolerated error. The accounts reviewed suggest that democracies are not exempt from risks of democratic erosion in war when adopting AI. Yet, the divergence in practices hints that AI does not autonomously drive erosion; rather, it amplifies contextual pressures such as conflict intensity, institutional culture, and threat perception. The conclusion underlines the necessity for regulatory and procedural frameworks for better aligning AI use with legal and ethical norms. This research contributes to deepening the understanding of the risks posed by AI in military operations with a novel, case‐based analysis, aiming to inform policy discussions on the responsible deployment of AI systems in contemporary and future conflicts.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandra Russo, 2026. "Does AI Affect the Democratic Conduct of War? Analyzing US and Israeli Military AI Deployment," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 17(S2), pages 45-56, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:17:y:2026:i:s2:p:s45-s56
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70117
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.70117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:17:y:2026:i:s2:p:s45-s56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.