IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v17y2026i2p338-352.html

Assessing Ill‐Being and Economic Stress: Negative Inputs and Civil Society in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Charles‐Henri DiMaria

Abstract

Unemployment, job insecurity, and inflation are major economic factors that contribute to stress and anxiety among the population, often reflected in reported levels of ill‐being. This study examined how these adverse economic conditions impact ill‐being across European countries from 2005 to 2019. The aim was to identify nations that manage to minimize ill‐being despite facing significant negative economic events. To do this, we applied a benchmarking method called data envelopment analysis (DEA). While DEA is commonly used to study well‐being, it is not typically suited to analyze ill‐being. For this reason, we are the first to apply a variant of this method, known as anti‐efficiency or pessimistic DEA, in the context of well‐being research. Our findings show that Nordic countries are particularly effective in mitigating the impact of economic challenges on ill‐being. Furthermore, we observe that countries with efficient public administration systems tend to better manage ill‐being.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles‐Henri DiMaria, 2026. "Assessing Ill‐Being and Economic Stress: Negative Inputs and Civil Society in Europe," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 17(2), pages 338-352, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:17:y:2026:i:2:p:338-352
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70132
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.70132?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:17:y:2026:i:2:p:338-352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.