IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v17y2026i2p200-209.html

Power Transition and Pragmatic Adaptation: Iran's Strategic Approach to China, Russia and the GCC

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Bazoobandi

Abstract

This study examines how Iranian strategic thinkers conceptualise the country's ‘Look East’ policy (i.e., relations with China and Russia) and the GCC states. Using thematic qualitative content analysis of approximately 70 documents from Iranian state official, advisory and academic institutions (2015–2025), it reveals that Iran's eastward orientation is shaped by economic imperatives stemming from Western sanctions, dual security considerations encompassing power projection and defensive deterrence and aspirational positioning within an anticipated multipolar order. The analysis demonstrates that Iranian strategic narrative exhibits sophisticated cost–benefit calculations, acknowledging both opportunities and limitations of these partnerships. Recent events, particularly the 2023–2025 conflicts, have exposed critical vulnerabilities in Iran's strategic framework, raising questions about whether these partnerships can provide the strategic resilience Tehran anticipated.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Bazoobandi, 2026. "Power Transition and Pragmatic Adaptation: Iran's Strategic Approach to China, Russia and the GCC," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 17(2), pages 200-209, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:17:y:2026:i:2:p:200-209
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70139
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.70139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew Cooper & Daniel Flemes, 2013. "Foreign Policy Strategies of Emerging Powers in a Multipolar World: an introductory review," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(6), pages 943-962.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ikrame Kohl, 2025. "Navigating Multipolarity: The Evolution of Foreign Policy Strategies through a Political Science Lens," Journal of International Relations and Policy, CARI Journals Limited, vol. 6(1), pages 19-38.
    2. Luša Đana, 2017. "Olympic Diplomacy and the Emerging States: Striving for Influence in the Multipolar World," Croatian International Relations Review, Sciendo, vol. 23(79), pages 73-102, September.
    3. Gonca Oguz Gok & Mehmet Sahin Gok, 2016. "Emerging Economies: Comparative Analysis of MIST and IBSA Countries," Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Eurasian Publications, vol. 4(2), pages 1-13.
    4. Dennis Patterson & Jangsup Choi, 2018. "Diplomacy, trade, and South Korea’s rise to international influence," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 21(1), pages 9-27, March.
    5. Péter KACZIBA & Barış HASAN, 2022. "Hybrid foreign policies in the EU’s Eastern flank: adaptive diplomacy," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 13, pages 207-235, October.
    6. Felix Chidozie & Goddy Uwa Osimen & Joy Bhadmus & Oluwamurewa Newo, 2025. "Sustainable development goals implementation in a post‐colonial African State: Any future for the African Continental Free Trade Area?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 1479-1490, February.
    7. Ricardo E. Buitrago R. & James Rajasekar & Jorge Alcaraz, 2023. "Soft Power in emerging economies: A partial least squares – structural equation modeling exploratory analysis of the effects on outward foreign direct investment," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 26(3), pages 211-234, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:17:y:2026:i:2:p:200-209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.