IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v17y2026i1p81-93.html

Terrorism and U.S. and Chinese Overseas Foreign Direct Investment in the Developing World

Author

Listed:
  • Kelan (Lilly) Lu
  • Glen Biglaiser
  • Lance Y. Hunter

Abstract

Much scholarship finds a negative but inconsistent statistical relationship between host‐state terrorism and overseas foreign direct investment (FDI). However, empirical studies generally have not investigated terrorism in the context of Chinese overseas FDI. Comparing United States and Chinese overseas FDI for up to 107 developing countries from 2004–2018, and using a Two‐Stage‐Difference‐in‐Difference approach as well as a dynamic panel data analysis approach (i.e., the System General Method of Moments), we find a negative and at times statistically significant association between terrorism and U.S. FDI and a positive and frequently statistically significant relationship between terrorism and Chinese FDI, and this is true for both Chinese public and private investors. We argue that the U.S. and Chinese governments have different effects on overseas FDI, where the U.S. has a limited impact while China often encourages its firms to tolerate risk. Our research suggests that the nature of home governments affects the risk perception of their overseas investors.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelan (Lilly) Lu & Glen Biglaiser & Lance Y. Hunter, 2026. "Terrorism and U.S. and Chinese Overseas Foreign Direct Investment in the Developing World," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 17(1), pages 81-93, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:17:y:2026:i:1:p:81-93
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70113
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.70113?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:17:y:2026:i:1:p:81-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.