IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v16y2025i5p907-920.html

A Comparative Analysis of United States and European Union Digital Diplomacy in India

Author

Listed:
  • Stefano Greco

Abstract

Situated within a constructivist framework, this study undertakes a comparative analysis of digital diplomacy strategies employed by the United States and the European Union in India. The novelty of the study lies in its investigation of digital diplomacy as a tool for constructing state–public communication with post‐colonial societies experiencing rising global influence. By examining over 2000 Facebook posts and 92,000 comments published between 2021 and 2024, the research employs a mixed‐methods approach, integrating descriptive statistical analysis with content and discourse analysis. The study focuses on the thematic priorities, communication styles, and engagement effectiveness to advance understanding of how public diplomacy constructs intersubjective meanings and shapes foreign publics. Providing an insightful case study, the findings show that the United States adopts a broader, audience‐centered strategy, characterized by frequent posting and narratives tailored to the targeted society. By contrast, the EU's approach remains more formal, generating limited engagement, and highlights the challenges digital diplomacy entails. Moving beyond a performative view, the findings underline the constitutive potential of digital diplomacy and social media in shaping public perceptions, shared values, intersubjective interpretations, and transnational identities in emerging countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefano Greco, 2025. "A Comparative Analysis of United States and European Union Digital Diplomacy in India," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(5), pages 907-920, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:5:p:907-920
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70088
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70088
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.70088?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:5:p:907-920. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.