IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v16y2025i5p898-906.html

Multilateralism at a Crossroads: Rethinking UK Status and Influence at the UN Security Council

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Peak
  • Samuel Jarvis

Abstract

During a period of increased global tensions over the future direction of multilateralism, the UN Security Council faces significant questions over its continued legitimacy. Consequently, demands for formal reform initiatives have grown, challenging the unequal distribution of power within the Council and the continued influence of colonial legacies. Yet despite these claims, it is still commonly assumed that the UK must work to retain all the key privileges that come from holding a permanent seat to help maintain its status and prestige. In contrast, we outline how the UK's current position actually fuels resentment and undermines the post‐Brexit ‘Global Britain’ agenda. In response, this article offers a non‐ideal solution where the UK retains its permanent seat but aligns its use with national interests through bringing forward informal delegation practices and coalition building, as well as developing innovative working methods to generate greater cooperation between permanent and elected members. In doing so we argue that through a more delegated approach the UK could demonstrate its commitment to fairness and multilateralism in a way that wins allies and positions it as a leading advocate for reform even in a time of increased great power competition.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Peak & Samuel Jarvis, 2025. "Multilateralism at a Crossroads: Rethinking UK Status and Influence at the UN Security Council," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(5), pages 898-906, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:5:p:898-906
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70065
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.70065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:5:p:898-906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.