IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v16y2025i5p1063-1074.html

Gender Discrimination in Global Clothing Tariffs

Author

Listed:
  • James Scott

Abstract

There is increasing recognition of women suffering a ‘pink tax’, paying higher prices for (near) identical products than those marketed to men. One potential cause of this is governments charging different import tariffs on men's and women's clothing, facilitated by the fact that the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System (HS) splits all apparel by gender. This article examines four questions: why are the HS codes disaggregated by gender in this one sector; to what extent do countries charge different tariffs on men's and women's clothing; where they do, who is being discriminated against; and how is the level and direction of discrimination changing over time? The analysis finds that around three quarters of countries do not discriminate in their tariff schedules. However, among those that do, contrary to the expectations of the pink tax literature states overall employ higher tariffs on men's clothes than women's, though there is some evidence that this is reversing over time and the result is heavily driven by a few outlier countries. The conclusion sets out some routes to tackling this discrimination if moves to mainstream gender into trade policy are to amount to more than rhetoric.

Suggested Citation

  • James Scott, 2025. "Gender Discrimination in Global Clothing Tariffs," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1063-1074, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:5:p:1063-1074
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70070
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70070
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.70070?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:5:p:1063-1074. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.