IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v16y2025i4p691-697.html

Managerialism and the Changing Politics of Inclusion

Author

Listed:
  • Kavi Joseph Abraham

Abstract

This contribution examines the tension between political inclusion and informal hierarchy found in the Hybrid Institutional Complex (HIC) for sustainable development. By drawing attention to the managerial logic underpinning the making of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), I highlight how increased inclusion leads to weaker obligations and institutional fragmentation if not simultaneously accompanied by proper resourcing of governance orchestrators such as the High‐Level Political Forum (HLPF). However, I argue that the SDGs have been successful at the level of ‘metagovernance’, specifically in reshaping the meaning of political inclusion within global governance. The growing emphasis on quantitative metrics and disaggregated data has shifted what counts as meaningful inclusion from having a seat at the table to translating political demands into measurable indicators. I use the human rights community to explore these dynamics. The analysis concludes with policy recommendations for state and civil society actors about strengthening coordination, balancing metrics with normative appeals and more radical democratic politics, and carefully balancing the utility of big data with other ethical concerns.

Suggested Citation

  • Kavi Joseph Abraham, 2025. "Managerialism and the Changing Politics of Inclusion," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(4), pages 691-697, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:4:p:691-697
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70049
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.70049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melanie van Driel & Frank Biermann & Rakhyun E. Kim & Marjanneke J. Vijge, 2022. "International organisations as ‘custodians’ of the sustainable development goals? Fragmentation and coordination in sustainability governance," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(5), pages 669-682, November.
    2. Matthew Eagleton-Pierce & Samuel Knafo, 2020. "Introduction: the political economy of managerialism," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 763-779, July.
    3. Kenneth W. Abbott & Steven Bernstein, 2015. "The High-Level Political Forum on Sustainable Development: Orchestration by Default and Design," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 6(3), pages 222-233, September.
    4. Jean-Philippe Thérien & Vincent Pouliot, 2020. "Global governance as patchwork: the making of the Sustainable Development Goals," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 612-636, May.
    5. Pratt, Tyler, 2018. "Deference and Hierarchy in International Regime Complexes—ERRATUM," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 72(3), pages 761-762, July.
    6. Pratt, Tyler, 2018. "Deference and Hierarchy in International Regime Complexes," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 72(3), pages 561-590, July.
    7. Samuel Knafo, 2020. "Neoliberalism and the origins of public management," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 780-801, July.
    8. Leonard Seabrooke & Ole Jacob Sending, 2020. "Contracting development: managerialism and consultants in intergovernmental organizations," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 802-827, July.
    9. Kelley, Judith G. & Simmons, Beth A., 2019. "Introduction: The Power of Global Performance Indicators," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 73(3), pages 491-510, July.
    10. Karen J. Alter, 2022. "The promise and perils of theorizing international regime complexity in an evolving world," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 375-396, April.
    11. Lisa L. Martin, 2021. "Formality, typologies, and institutional design," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 175-182, January.
    12. Juanita Uribe, 2024. "Excluding through inclusion: managerial practices in the era of multistakeholder governance," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 1686-1709, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mette Eilstrup-Sangiovanni & Oliver Westerwinter, 2022. "The global governance complexity cube: Varieties of institutional complexity in global governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 233-262, April.
    2. Fuß, Julia & Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian & Saravia, Andrés & Zürn, Michael, 2021. "Managing regime complexity: Introducing the interface conflicts 1.0 dataset," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2021-101, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    3. Mette Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, 2022. "Ordering global governance complexes: The evolution of the governance complex for international civil aviation," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 293-322, April.
    4. Sunn Bush, Sarah & Cottiero, Christina & Prather, Lauren, 2024. "Zombies Ahead: Explaining the Rise of Low-Quality Election Monitoring," Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Working Paper Series qt2fc2d3pr, Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California.
    5. Julija Loginovic & Stuart Shields, 2025. "United Nations 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals: Hybrid Institutional Complexes as Hegemony‐Building?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(4), pages 724-730, September.
    6. Yoram Z. Haftel & Tobias Lenz, 2022. "Measuring institutional overlap in global governance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 323-347, April.
    7. Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian & Schmotz, Alexander & Zürn, Michael, 2025. "The complex effects of regime complexity: a conflict model," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue OnlineFir, pages 1-28.
    8. Andrew Lugg, 2024. "Re-contracting intergovernmental organizations: Membership change and the creation of linked intergovernmental organizations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 545-577, September.
    9. Magdalena Bexell, 2024. "Indicator accountability or policy shrinking? Multistakeholder partnerships in reviews of the sustainable development goals," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(2), pages 276-287, May.
    10. Diana Panke & Sören Stapel, 2024. "Cooperation between international organizations: Demand, supply, and restraint," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 269-305, April.
    11. Sarah Sunn Bush & Christina Cottiero & Lauren Prather, 2025. "Zombies ahead: Explaining the rise of low-quality election monitoring," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 261-291, June.
    12. T. Renee Bowen & J. Lawrence Broz & Christina J. Schneider, 2026. "Domestic politics and international organizations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-40, March.
    13. Matias E. Margulis, 2021. "Intervention by international organizations in regime complexes," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 871-902, October.
    14. Faude, Benjamin, 2020. "International institutions in hard times: how institutional complexity increases resilience," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108663, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Jack Taggart & Benjamin Faude, 2025. "Boon or Bane?: The Hybrid Institutional Complex for the Sustainable Development Goals," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(4), pages 682-690, September.
    16. Rafael Mesquita & Antonio Pires, 2025. "The references of the nations: Introducing a corpus of United Nations General Assembly resolutions since 1946 and their citation network," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 62(4), pages 1279-1291, July.
    17. Lucia Quaglia & Aneta Spendzharova, 2022. "Regime complexity and managing financial data streams: The orchestration of trade reporting for derivatives," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 588-602, April.
    18. Lauren Ferry & Cleo O’Brien-Udry, 2025. "The possibilities and limits of international status: Evidence from foreign aid and public opinion," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 711-740, December.
    19. Karen J. Alter, 2022. "The promise and perils of theorizing international regime complexity in an evolving world," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 375-396, April.
    20. Jho, Whasun & Kim, Youngwan, 2022. "Regime complexity and state competition over Global Internet Governance," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(2).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:4:p:691-697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.