IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v16y2025i4p682-690.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Boon or Bane?: The Hybrid Institutional Complex for the Sustainable Development Goals

Author

Listed:
  • Jack Taggart
  • Benjamin Faude

Abstract

This Special Section marks the tenth anniversary of the United Nations' 2030 Agenda and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Progress on the latter has been dismal, with only 17% of targets on track. The contributions to this Special Section explore the global governance of the SDGs as a Hybrid Institutional Complex (HIC): a global governance complex characterized by institutional diversity in that it combines formal intergovernmental organizations, informal intergovernmental institutions, public‐private partnerships, multistakeholder initiatives, and private transnational institutions. The HIC framework suggests that this institutional diversity can offer governance benefits, such as good substantive fit for addressing complex transboundary SDG challenges and good political fit by including a broad swathe of actors relevant for goal attainment. Yet it also highlights governance risks, including individual institutions assuming governance tasks that they are poorly suited for and powerful actors cherry‐picking goals and softer forms of governance that fit their interests. By applying the HIC concept to discrete dimensions of SDG governance and subfields, the contributions examine whether institutional diversity is driving or hindering progress. As we approach the 2030 deadline, they provide insights into the benefits and risks of HIC‐based SDG governance, offering reflections on the remaining and post‐2030 development agenda.

Suggested Citation

  • Jack Taggart & Benjamin Faude, 2025. "Boon or Bane?: The Hybrid Institutional Complex for the Sustainable Development Goals," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(4), pages 682-690, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:4:p:682-690
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70084
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.70084?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:4:p:682-690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.