IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v16y2025i4p568-578.html

Conceptualizing Utu as a Foreign Policy Doctrine for Aotearoa New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas Ross Smith
  • Bonnie Holster

Abstract

During Nanaia Mahuta's tenure as New Zealand's Foreign Minister (2020–2023), Aotearoa New Zealand experimented with a foreign policy guided by four tikanga (Māori customary practices), namely, manaakitanga (hospitality), whanaungatanga (connectedness), mahi tahi and kotahitanga (unity through collaboration), and kaitiakitanga (intergenerational guardianship). However, despite a clear rhetorical increase in the use of Māori perspectives, in practice, New Zealand's foreign policymaking remained ontologically and epistemologically Western‐centric. This paper argues that if New Zealand undertakes further experimentation with a Māori foreign policy in the future, then embracing the Māori concept of utu—broadly defined as the notion of balance through reciprocation—would provide a useful ontological and epistemological base. Using the case of the Whanganui River as a domestic example, an utu foreign policy is sketched out with an emphasis on harmony, mana, and reciprocity. Utu as a foreign policy doctrine would represent a radical departure from the status quo as it is both relational and non‐anthropocentric—as opposed to Western‐centric models that are anthropocentric and “scientific”—and would allow New Zealand to maintain its preference for independence as well as bringing the issue of climate change to the fore of its foreign policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas Ross Smith & Bonnie Holster, 2025. "Conceptualizing Utu as a Foreign Policy Doctrine for Aotearoa New Zealand," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(4), pages 568-578, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:4:p:568-578
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70010
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.70010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William C. Schaniel & Walter C. Neale, 2000. "Karl Polanyi’s Forms of Integration as Ways of Mapping," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 89-104, March.
    2. Keohane, Robert O., 1986. "Reciprocity in international relations," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(1), pages 1-27, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Tjarks, 2026. "Great urban transformations. Exploring ‘offensive countermovements’ in Polanyi’s instituted economy," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 44(1), pages 68-85, February.
    2. Mrázová, Monika, 2024. "Trade agreements when profits matter," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    3. Park, Mi Sun & Lee, Hyowon, 2019. "Accountability and reciprocal interests of bilateral forest cooperation under the global forest regime," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 32-44.
    4. Vincent Ibonye, 2017. "China–Africa cooperation: Struggling commodities and the silver-lining in the innovation economy," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 20(2), pages 160-178, June.
    5. Rotillon, Gilles & Tazdait, Tarik & Zeghni, Sylvain, 1996. "Bilateral or multilateral bargaining in the face of global environmental change?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 177-187, August.
    6. Johannes Urpelainen, 2011. "Domestic reform as a rationale for gradualism in international cooperation," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 23(3), pages 400-427, July.
    7. Stephanie C. Hofmann, 2021. "Elastic Relations: Looking to both Sides of the Atlantic in the 2020 US Presidential Election Year," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(S1), pages 150-161, September.
    8. Solingen, Etel & Ozyurt, Saba Şenses, 2004. "Mare Nostrum? The Sources, Logic, and Dilemmas of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership," Institute of European Studies, Working Paper Series qt4kj4q4c8, Institute of European Studies, UC Berkeley.
    9. Henri Barki & Alain Pinsonneault, 2005. "A Model of Organizational Integration, Implementation Effort, and Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 165-179, April.
    10. Blatter, Joachim, 2018. "Transnationalizing democracy properly: Principles and rules for granting consociated citizens voting rights and partisan representation in the parliaments of nation states," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2018-102, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    11. Koos van Wyk & Sarah Radloff, 1993. "Symmetry and Reciprocity in South Africa's Foreign Policy," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 37(2), pages 382-396, June.
    12. Yujin J. Jung, 2024. "Cyber Shadows over Nuclear Peace: Understanding and Mitigating Digital Threats to Global Security," Journal of Asian Security and International Affairs, , vol. 11(2), pages 233-253, June.
    13. Lisa L. Martin, 1994. "4. Heterogeneity, Linkage and Commons Problems," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 6(4), pages 473-493, October.
    14. Razeen Sally, 1998. "Classical Liberalism and International Economic Order: An Advance Sketch," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 19-44, March.
    15. Péter Marton & Balázs Szent‐Iványi, 2025. "Minding the Gaps: Solidaristic Transfers and Burden‐Sharing in the European Union and Its Member States' Pandemic Response," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(6), pages 1966-1983, November.
    16. Thiago Lima & Adriana Erthal Abdenur, 2026. "A new architecture of solidarity: The Global Alliance Against Hunger and Poverty in an age of weakened multilateralism," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 44(3), May.
    17. Senti Richard, 2006. "Argumente für und wider die Reziprozität in der WTO – Die Reziprozität als merkantilistisches Erbe in der geltenden Welthandelsordnung / The merits of reciprocity in the WTO," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 57(1), pages 315-340, January.
    18. Liam F. Beiser-McGrath & Thomas Bernauer & Jaehyun Song & Azusa Uji, 2021. "Understanding public support for domestic contributions to global collective goods," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 1-20, June.
    19. Jin Mun Jeong & Dursun Peksen, 2019. "Domestic Institutional Constraints, Veto Players, and Sanction Effectiveness," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(1), pages 194-217, January.
    20. Hamanaka, Shintaro, 2018. "Why breakup?: looking into unsuccessful free trade agreement negotiations," IDE Discussion Papers 697, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:4:p:568-578. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.