IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v16y2025i4p553-567.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Civil Society Participation in Creating the SDG Indicator Framework: Open but Limited

Author

Listed:
  • Roni Kay M. O'Dell

Abstract

This article analyzes how Civil Society and other Stakeholders (CSoS) participated in the creation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) indicator framework from 2015 to 2016. After the UN General Assembly (UNGA) approved the 17 SDGs and 169 targets, the UN Statistical Commission formed the Inter‐Agency and Expert Group on SDG Indicators (IAEG‐SDGs) to negotiate indicators to measure the SDGs. Using a democratic governance framework of participation, this article analyzes how the UN Non‐Governmental Liaison Service, several teams in the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, and the IAEG‐SDGs included CSoS in consultations and negotiations and who participated. The term CSoS is broadly used to include nongovernmental organizations, academia, the private sector, and other groups (e.g., Major Groups or campaigns). The paper assesses the extent of democratic consultation. The research relies on interviews, document and video analysis, and an author‐created database of respondents to initial open consultations. Analysis shows that organizations from the Global North and those with more access to resources or networked coalitions dominated. The research indicates that the UN can be committed to supporting democratic governance, but concerns arise related to the extent of participation that is encouraged or allowed by UN bureaucracy and Member States. Insight from this article can be applied to ongoing consultations and inclusive practices in international negotiations at the UN.

Suggested Citation

  • Roni Kay M. O'Dell, 2025. "Civil Society Participation in Creating the SDG Indicator Framework: Open but Limited," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(4), pages 553-567, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:4:p:553-567
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70025
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.70025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:4:p:553-567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.