IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v16y2025i4p514-524.html

Who Could Deploy Stratospheric Aerosol Injection? The United States, China, and Large‐Scale, Rapid Planetary Cooling

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua B. Horton
  • Wake Smith
  • David W. Keith

Abstract

Stratospheric aerosol injection, which would reflect a small fraction of sunlight away from the Earth to lower temperatures, involves many unanswered questions. One of these is, who could deploy it? We consider this with reference to a scenario in which global temperatures are reduced by 1°C by midcentury; we term this a ‘PLUS’ deployment—Planetary, Large‐scale, Uninterrupted, and Speedy. The technical requirements of a PLUS deployment—a fleet of a hundred or more specialized aircraft—limit the number of capable actors to ten states. The geopolitical requirements—broad‐spectrum capabilities sufficient to overcome external constraints—mean that only the US and China are capable of implementing unilaterally against strong opposition. As such, the US and China will be decisive in determining whether and how a PLUS‐type deployment takes place. In particular, the degree of Sino‐American alignment on this issue will strongly influence the likelihood of a PLUS deployment and its disruptive potential. We examine three cases in which activities with the potential to harm global commons were debated during the Cold War: scientific research in Antarctica, atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons, and experiments in outer space. Backed by evidence from these cases, we then consider several implications of our findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua B. Horton & Wake Smith & David W. Keith, 2025. "Who Could Deploy Stratospheric Aerosol Injection? The United States, China, and Large‐Scale, Rapid Planetary Cooling," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(4), pages 514-524, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:4:p:514-524
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70015
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.70015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Janssens & I. E. Vries & S. J. Hulshoff, 2020. "A specialised delivery system for stratospheric sulphate aerosols: design and operation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(1), pages 67-85, September.
    2. David G. Victor, 2008. "On the regulation of geoengineering," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 24(2), pages 322-336, Summer.
    3. Christopher J. Preston, 2013. "Ethics and geoengineering: reviewing the moral issues raised by solar radiation management and carbon dioxide removal," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(1), pages 23-37, January.
    4. Joshua B. Horton & Kerryn Brent & Zhen Dai & Tyler Felgenhauer & Oliver Geden & Jan McDonald & Jeffrey McGee & Felix Schenuit & Jianhua Xu, 2023. "Solar geoengineering research programs on national agendas: a comparative analysis of Germany, China, Australia, and the United States," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(4), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Daniel Bodansky & Rafe Pomerance, 2021. "Sustaining the Arctic in Order to Sustain the Global Climate System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-5, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Seth D. Baum & Timothy M. Maher & Jacob Haqq-Misra, 2013. "Double catastrophe: intermittent stratospheric geoengineering induced by societal collapse," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 168-180, March.
    2. Detlef Vuuren & Elke Stehfest, 2013. "If climate action becomes urgent: the importance of response times for various climate strategies," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 473-486, December.
    3. Todd Sandler, 2018. "Collective action and geoengineering," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 105-125, March.
    4. Heutel, Garth & Moreno-Cruz, Juan & Shayegh, Soheil, 2016. "Climate tipping points and solar geoengineering," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 132(PB), pages 19-45.
    5. Nils Matzner & Robert Herrenbrück, 2017. "Simulating a Climate Engineering Crisis," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(2), pages 268-290, April.
    6. Timo Goeschl & Daniel Heyen & Juan Moreno-Cruz, 2013. "The Intergenerational Transfer of Solar Radiation Management Capabilities and Atmospheric Carbon Stocks," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 56(1), pages 85-104, September.
    7. Wil Burns & Simon Nicholson, 2017. "Bioenergy and carbon capture with storage (BECCS): the prospects and challenges of an emerging climate policy response," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 7(4), pages 527-534, December.
    8. Heyen, Daniel, 2015. "Strategic Conflicts on the Horizon: R&D Incentives for Environmental Technologies," Working Papers 0584, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    9. Arthur R. Obst, 2026. "What would Aldo Leopold think about geoengineering?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Heyen, Daniel & Tavoni, Alessandro, 2024. "Strategic dimensions of solar geoengineering: Economic theory and experiments," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    11. Heyen, Daniel & Horton, Joshua & Moreno-Cruz, Juan, 2019. "Strategic implications of counter-geoengineering: Clash or cooperation?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 153-177.
    12. Wake Smith & Claire Henly, 2021. "Updated and outdated reservations about research into stratospheric aerosol injection," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 1-15, February.
    13. Heyen, Daniel, 2016. "Strategic conflicts on the horizon: R&D incentives for environmental technologies," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 68104, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Johannes Urpelainen, 2012. "Geoengineering and global warming: a strategic perspective," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 375-389, November.
    15. Dipu, Sudhakar & Quaas, Johannes & Quaas, Martin & Rickels, Wilfried & Mülmenstädt, Johannes & Boucher, Olivier, 2021. "Substantial Climate Response outside the Target Area in an Idealized Experiment of Regional Radiation Management," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 240193, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    16. Daniel Bodansky, 2013. "The who, what, and wherefore of geoengineering governance," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 539-551, December.
    17. Joseph E. Aldy & Alan J. Krupnick & Richard G. Newell & Ian W. H. Parry & William A. Pizer, 2010. "Designing Climate Mitigation Policy," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 48(4), pages 903-934, December.
    18. Moreno-Cruz, Juan B. & Smulders, Sjak, 2017. "Revisiting the economics of climate change: the role of geoengineering," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 212-224.
    19. Richard S.J. Tol, 2016. "Distributional Implications of Geoengineering," Working Paper Series 08316, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    20. Merk, Christine & Pönitzsch, Gert & Kniebes, Carola & Rehdanz, Katrin & Schmidt, Ulrich, 2014. "Exploring public perception of solar radiation management," Kiel Working Papers 1892, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:4:p:514-524. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.