IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v16y2025i2p403-409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reflections on Applying Systems Thinking to Stakeholder Mapping: The STOA Unit at the European Parliament

Author

Listed:
  • Valentina Amuso
  • Lieve Van Woensel

Abstract

The EU has increasingly embraced foresight—a discipline aimed at enhancing preparedness by systematically exploring plausible futures—to minimise uncertainty and inform anticipatory governance. Within this context, the STOA Unit of the European Parliament has been actively engaged in foresight activities, developing the STEEPED framework for conducting systemic analyses of the ecosystems, in which the innovation, event or crisis is placed. The goal of the STEEPED framework is to offer a comprehensive system view. The STEEPED framework has been employed to guide horizon scanning, trend analyses and stakeholder selection. Specifically, stakeholder engagement is a crucial element in foresight analyses. The effectiveness of foresight analysis largely depends on stakeholders' ability to augment discussions via expertise and lived experiences. We explore how, through the STEEPED framework, STOA has informed foresight analysis and stakeholder mapping in the 10 years since its inception. Although the framework may represent a robust approach to analysis, it could be enhanced by more directly focusing on aspects such as affiliation, stakeholders' features and relations, highlighted in academic research on stakeholder mapping. We propose a novel framework in the form of a checklist that integrates principles from the STEEPED framework with perspectives from scholarly literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Valentina Amuso & Lieve Van Woensel, 2025. "Reflections on Applying Systems Thinking to Stakeholder Mapping: The STOA Unit at the European Parliament," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(2), pages 403-409, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:2:p:403-409
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13494
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13494?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:2:p:403-409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.