IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v16y2025i2p289-298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collision Course: How Iran and Israel Brought the Middle East to the Brink of War

Author

Listed:
  • Rob Geist Pinfold
  • Clive Jones
  • Anoushiravan Ehteshami

Abstract

This policy analysis asks: what has caused and now sustains the violent escalation cycle that is re‐defining the Middle East and how will this all end? It analyses Iran and Israel's grand strategies. It argues that both employ force to achieve strategic depth and both bifurcate the region into two blocs doomed to constantly fight for hegemony. Equally, they both share the same flaws. Israel and Iran alike prioritise conflict management over conflict resolution. But neither are effective are achieving this pessimistic goal. Concurrently, the ongoing conflict has precipitated a role reversal in Iran and Israel's regional visions. Israel is a traditionally a status quo power, whereas Iran has followed a revisionist grand strategy. However, it is Israel that is now the region's peremptory revisionist power. This is because the October 7 attacks have caused Israel to no longer tolerate hostile actors on its borders. Equally, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu seeks a1967 moment: a regional reordering in Israel's favour. Conversely, Iran is now an increasingly status quo power; it seeks a cease‐fire in the current conflict because it feels that it is losing and needs to preserve its regional assets.

Suggested Citation

  • Rob Geist Pinfold & Clive Jones & Anoushiravan Ehteshami, 2025. "Collision Course: How Iran and Israel Brought the Middle East to the Brink of War," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(2), pages 289-298, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:2:p:289-298
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70004
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.70004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:2:p:289-298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.