IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v16y2025i2p266-274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global Labour Governance by Numbers: A Comparison of the ILO and OECD

Author

Listed:
  • Vicente Silva
  • Huw Thomas
  • John Berten

Abstract

The emergence of governance by numbers (GBN) has seen the increasing use of metrics to influence government and corporate behaviour, but its uptake varies significantly across international organisations. This study examines the adoption of GBN in global labour governance at the International Labour Organisation (ILO) and the Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development (OECD). Using a comparative institutional approach, we highlight the ILO's resistance to developing indicators of decent work and economic performance, despite support from the labour movement. Conversely, the OECD has fully embraced GBN through labour market performance measurements, which makes some of its normative proposals less visible due to their qualitative nature. We conclude that the adoption of GBN is not inevitable and depends on the organisational cultures and structures of international organisations.

Suggested Citation

  • Vicente Silva & Huw Thomas & John Berten, 2025. "Global Labour Governance by Numbers: A Comparison of the ILO and OECD," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(2), pages 266-274, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:2:p:266-274
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.70002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70002
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.70002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:2:p:266-274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.