IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v16y2025i2p235-245.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

American Public Opinion on US Responses to Russia's Nuclear Threats in Ukraine

Author

Listed:
  • Kaitlin Peach
  • Andrew Fox
  • Kuhika Gupta
  • Joseph Ripberger
  • Cheyenne Black
  • Tristan Winkle
  • Hank Jenkins‐Smith

Abstract

Since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, President Vladimir Putin's nuclear threats have reshaped the global nuclear landscape, potentially altering public attitudes toward nuclear deterrence and weapons use. This article examines American preferences for United States responses—nuclear, conventional, or nonmilitary—to three hypothetical scenarios involving Russia's potential use of nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Drawing on data from the 2022 National Security Survey by the Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis, we find that the American public generally favors conventional military responses over nuclear options, even in the face of increased nuclear threats. Qualitative analysis reveals that respondents primarily apply a “logic of consequences,” prioritizing strategic military utility over ethical or normative concerns when considering responses. These findings have significant implications for US nuclear policy and the theoretical discourse on nuclear nonuse.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaitlin Peach & Andrew Fox & Kuhika Gupta & Joseph Ripberger & Cheyenne Black & Tristan Winkle & Hank Jenkins‐Smith, 2025. "American Public Opinion on US Responses to Russia's Nuclear Threats in Ukraine," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 16(2), pages 235-245, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:2:p:235-245
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13490
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13490
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13490?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:16:y:2025:i:2:p:235-245. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.