IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v14y2023i3p500-515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Addressing the atomic bomb damage: Associations between ‘state compensation’ demands and aspects of survivors' suffering

Author

Listed:
  • Vladisaya Bilyanova Vasileva
  • Shizue Izumi
  • Noriyuki Kawano

Abstract

To address the long‐lasting consequences of the atomic bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, in 1994, the Japanese government implemented the current in‐force Atomic Bomb Survivors Support Law. This substantial policy offers medical, health and welfare measures and even incorporates some reparations‐like aspects. Nevertheless, atomic bomb survivors' organisations have severely criticised the government for failing to adequately address the entirety and inhumanity of the atomic bomb damage by refusing to enact the law on a clearly stated principle of ‘state compensation’. As such, we attempt to clarify empirically what aspects of survivors' suffering are most closely associated with their demands for ‘state compensation’. Based on statistical model‐based analysis, survivors who deem that ‘state compensation’ should be enacted experience frequent flashbacks of the bombings, disadvantaged life opportunities and economic concerns, among others. We conclude the study by considering the difficulty in addressing the consequences of nuclear weapons use and testing through programmes that approximate, but fail to establish, clear reparations‐based measures, such as the current Atomic Bomb Survivors Support Law.

Suggested Citation

  • Vladisaya Bilyanova Vasileva & Shizue Izumi & Noriyuki Kawano, 2023. "Addressing the atomic bomb damage: Associations between ‘state compensation’ demands and aspects of survivors' suffering," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(3), pages 500-515, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:14:y:2023:i:3:p:500-515
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13231
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13231?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bonnie Docherty, 2021. "A Singular Opportunity: Setting Standards for Victim Assistance under the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(1), pages 126-130, February.
    2. Matthew Breay Bolton, 2022. "Human Rights Fallout of Nuclear Detonations: Reevaluating ‘Threshold Thinking’ in Assisting Victims of Nuclear Testing," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(1), pages 76-90, February.
    3. Matthew B. Bolton & Elizabeth Minor, 2021. "Addressing the Ongoing Humanitarian and Environmental Consequences of Nuclear Weapons: An Introductory Review," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(1), pages 81-99, February.
    4. Nate Van Duzer & Alicia Sanders‐Zakre, 2021. "Policy Approaches Addressing the Ongoing Humanitarian and Environmental Consequences of Nuclear Weapons: A Commentary," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(1), pages 100-105, February.
    5. Elizabeth Minor & Hana Umezawa & Terumi Tanaka & Sueichi Kido & Dmitriy Vesselov, 2021. "Commentary on Addressing the Legacies of Nuclear Weapons Use and Testing: Perspectives from Survivors," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(1), pages 122-125, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew Breay Bolton, 2022. "Human Rights Fallout of Nuclear Detonations: Reevaluating ‘Threshold Thinking’ in Assisting Victims of Nuclear Testing," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 13(1), pages 76-90, February.
    2. Pata, Ugur Korkut & Destek, Mehmet Akif & Manga, Muge & Cengiz, Orhan, 2022. "Militarization of NATO Countries Sparks Climate Change? Investigating the Moderating Role of Technological Progress and Financial Development," MPRA Paper 117567, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Matthew Breay Bolton & Katherine Ketterer, 2023. "Environmental remediation as social archaeology: Excavating sites contaminated by early nuclear weapons activities in New York City, both literally and hermeneutically," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(2), pages 318-330, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:14:y:2023:i:3:p:500-515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.