IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/germec/v15y2014i4p473-496.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Economists Have a Fatherland? How Global and National Efficiency Considerations Influence Economists’ Policy Judgements

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Jacob
  • Detlef Fetchenhauer
  • Fabian Christandl

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="geer12017-abs-0001"> This study evaluates whether economists support economic policies such as free trade because they deem them to be good for their home country or because they increase global welfare. In a telephone survey, 100 German economists were asked to judge different policy proposals dealing with immigration, military exports and climate policy. Our results show that the acceptance of the policy proposals is strongly influenced by national efficiency judgements. In contrast, global efficiency judgements exert no significant positive effect on policy proposal acceptance. These effects even hold for economists who self-reported a global perspective in the assessment of the policy proposals. These judgements might be based on the potentially erroneous assumption that their policy judgements, taken from a national perspective, are consistent with global interests.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Jacob & Detlef Fetchenhauer & Fabian Christandl, 2014. "Do Economists Have a Fatherland? How Global and National Efficiency Considerations Influence Economists’ Policy Judgements," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 15(4), pages 473-496, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:germec:v:15:y:2014:i:4:p:473-496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/geer.2014.15.issue-4
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:germec:v:15:y:2014:i:4:p:473-496. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfsocea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.