IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v33y2026i5p1760-1777.html

Reimagining Trust as Feminist Praxis: A Transnational Analysis of Gender and Public Confidence in Women's Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Ruby Amanda Oboro‐Offerie

Abstract

This paper examines trust in women's organizations as a gendered and contextually embedded dimension of institutional trust, drawing on data from 90,192 respondents across 60 countries using the 2017–2022 World Values Survey, the World Bank, and Varieties of Democracy. Employing linear multilevel mixed‐effects models, the analysis conceptualizes trust in women's organizations as a form of feminist praxis and as a socially situated evaluation shaped by universalized assumptions about women's shared interests, experiences, and gender inequalities. The findings show that women express significantly higher trust in women's organizations than men, although the magnitude of this difference is small and varies across countries. Integrating critical transnational feminist theory with cross‐national quantitative analysis, the study contributes to debates on institutional trust and transnational feminism by demonstrating how transnational feminist mobilizing norms circulate globally yet are unevenly recognized and institutionalized across geopolitical contexts. Methodologically, this paper advances a decolonial and inclusive feminist approach to quantitative analysis by mobilizing multilevel modeling to center geospatial variation in women's organizing and empirically demonstrate how the politics of difference in feminism shape trust in women's organizations, thereby challenging Global North, Eurocentric, and universalist assumptions through which White feminism has historically reproduced hierarchy and the limits of solidarity.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruby Amanda Oboro‐Offerie, 2026. "Reimagining Trust as Feminist Praxis: A Transnational Analysis of Gender and Public Confidence in Women's Organizations," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 1760-1777, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:5:p:1760-1777
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.70153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70153
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.70153?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:5:p:1760-1777. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.