Author
Listed:
- Rita G. Klapper
- Paul J. Upham
- Sven Kuenzel
Abstract
This study investigates the experience of Black female leaders in UK business and the narratives of their lived experience of marginalization. Drawing principally on the rather small UK‐focused literature on this topic as context, as well as some of the much larger international literature, methodologically we use the approach to qualitative inquiry developed by John Shotter. Shotter argued strongly for understanding human experience from the inside, in a social constructivist form of phenomenological investigation that views “data gathering” in such contexts as a dialog between the researcher and the subject. The main research question is: How do Black female leaders in the UK understand and experience the barriers and challenges of being marginalised in contemporary business? One of our main contributions of this research is the methodological shift: by advocating for Shotter's “withness/withinness” thinking, we encourage a shift away from objectifying marginalized subjects as research objects, towards co‐created meaning‐making. In addition, we contribute to academic discourse by proposing new insights that both reaffirm and challenge existing paradigms relating to, for example, the nuanced distinction between “glass” and “concrete ceilings” in conventional feminist leadership discourse. The data analysis identified three key themes relating to the intersectional identity of black female leaders, two of which represent the internal dimensions of the intersectional identity of these black leaders: (a) “The Perception of Difference” and (b) “the Perception of Self.” The structural dimension of intersectional identity focuses on the “individual–organization relationship”. Both internal and structural dimensions are part and parcel of intersectional identity of black female leaders.
Suggested Citation
Rita G. Klapper & Paul J. Upham & Sven Kuenzel, 2026.
"An Exploration of the Inter‐Sectional Identity of Black Female Leaders in the UK: A Shotterian Study,"
Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 1692-1706, September.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:5:p:1692-1706
DOI: 10.1111/gwao.70131
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:5:p:1692-1706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.