IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v33y2026i5p1676-1691.html

Technofeminism at Work: Artificial Intelligence‐Mediated Negotiations and the Reproduction of Gendered Communication Norms

Author

Listed:
  • Sue H. Moon
  • Jing Betty Feng

Abstract

This study examines how artificial intelligence (AI) reshapes gender dynamics in workplace negotiations. Adopting a technofeminist lens, we conceptualize gender–technology relations as mutually shaping and fluid. Using a convergent mixed‐methods design, participants negotiated job offers with an AI chatbot recruiter. Qualitative transcript analysis identified gendered communication patterns, which were complemented by quantitative measures of negotiation outcomes and pre‐ and post‐survey results. Findings reveal a paradox: AI‐mediated negotiations muted traditional gender gaps—women and men achieved comparable outcomes—yet masculine‐coded communication styles were associated with higher scores than feminine‐coded communication styles. Participants also anthropomorphized the AI, projecting gendered identities that shaped satisfaction and outcomes. We introduce the concept of recursive human‐AI gender learning to explain how humans and algorithms iteratively train one another, reproducing gendered communication norms within seemingly neutral systems. The study contributes to feminist AI scholarship by illuminating how AI both disrupts and reproduces gendered power relations in organizational life.

Suggested Citation

  • Sue H. Moon & Jing Betty Feng, 2026. "Technofeminism at Work: Artificial Intelligence‐Mediated Negotiations and the Reproduction of Gendered Communication Norms," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 1676-1691, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:5:p:1676-1691
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.70145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70145
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.70145?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:5:p:1676-1691. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.