IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v33y2026i4p1270-1282.html

What Job Would You Apply To? Findings on the Impact of Language on Job Searches

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Maria Diaz
  • Luz Magdalena Salas
  • Claudia Piras
  • Agustina Suaya

Abstract

This study examines whether gender‐inclusive language in job advertisements can increase women's interest in applying for male‐dominated occupations. We implemented a discrete choice experiment with 5679 participants in Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru. Each respondent evaluates multiple paired ads for the same job with job content held constant and language cues varied within sets. The experimental treatments included replacing masculine‐coded skills with neutral descriptions, omitting skills altogether, using gender‐inclusive grammatical forms, and adding diversity statements. We find that inclusive language increases women's stated interest in applying with no evidence of backlash among men. Describing skills in neutral terms raises selection probabilities for both genders by around 40 percentage points. The use of gender‐inclusive endings increases women's likelihood of selecting an ad by 43 points, whereas diversity statements raise it by 58 points. In contrast, omitting skills reduces interest across the board. Effects are consistent across countries and subgroups. Our results add experimental evidence from Spanish‐speaking labor markets where grammatical gender is salient.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Maria Diaz & Luz Magdalena Salas & Claudia Piras & Agustina Suaya, 2026. "What Job Would You Apply To? Findings on the Impact of Language on Job Searches," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 1270-1282, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:4:p:1270-1282
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.70117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70117
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.70117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:4:p:1270-1282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.