IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v33y2026i4p1259-1269.html

Once an “Ideal Worker,” Always an “Ideal Worker”: The Impervious Status of Police Who Become Fathers

Author

Listed:
  • Danielle E. Thompson
  • Debra Langan

Abstract

Research chronicles the ways in which women police who are mothers are seen as being unfit for police work and promotional opportunities, as they navigate the male‐centric workplace and carry the bulk of domestic labor and childcare responsibilities at home. What has not been adequately addressed is whether, how, and to what extent police men who become fathers (“police fathers”) are seen as (un)fit for police work. We conducted 18 semi‐structured interviews with Canadian police fathers to examine how their experiences “fit” with the construct of the “ideal worker,” as fatherhood was announced and navigated at work. In our analysis, we compare our findings with research on the experiences of police mothers during similar stages of motherhood. Our findings demonstrate that in policing organizations, being a father is more flexible and negotiable in nature than being a mother. Even when they take parental leave—and potentially threaten “ideal worker” expectations—police fathers can carry out their roles as fathers in ways that maintain their connection to their service and ensure a continued “fit” with the “ideal worker” norm.

Suggested Citation

  • Danielle E. Thompson & Debra Langan, 2026. "Once an “Ideal Worker,” Always an “Ideal Worker”: The Impervious Status of Police Who Become Fathers," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 1259-1269, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:4:p:1259-1269
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.70120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70120
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.70120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:4:p:1259-1269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.