Author
Listed:
- Deborah Munro
- Jill Willis
- Andrew Gibson
- Melinda Laundon
Abstract
Women with unpaid caring responsibilities frequently wrestle with challenges when making decisions about higher education study, asking “Why can't I figure this out?” Statistics have persistently demonstrated that women undertake the majority of unpaid care work, however, unpaid carers are an underrepresented cohort in research, in higher education policy, and in widening participation initiatives. Higher education (HE) is an avenue for establishing a vocational identity, for career development and fulfilling life goals, yet female carers frequently encounter barriers and challenges when making decisions about higher education study. With little research available to equip HE institutions and career counselors to respond, Margaret Archer's Theory of Reflexivity and “DDD scheme,” Discernment, Deliberation, Dedication was used to investigate the social problem of how care responsibilities shape women's higher education decision‐making processes. This study examined the reflexive deliberation processes of unpaid carers through interviews with 15 Australian women who were considering HE enrollment. Each participant engaged in three in‐depth semi‐structured interviews incorporating a range of qualitative tools over a 6‐month period, resulting in a total of 45 interviews. Thematic analysis made visible the array of mental activities involved in the reflexive HE decision making processes undertaken by carers, revealing the often hidden personal, cultural and structural conditions that shape educational trajectories. This study offers insights for academic researchers, career counselors, policymakers and HE professional worldwide who seek to support carers' decision‐making processes, ultimately advancing widening participation agendas.
Suggested Citation
Deborah Munro & Jill Willis & Andrew Gibson & Melinda Laundon, 2026.
"Why Can't I Figure This Out? Identity Negotiation and Higher Education Decision Making Among Women With Caring Responsibilities,"
Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 947-959, May.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:3:p:947-959
DOI: 10.1111/gwao.70101
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:3:p:947-959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.