IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v33y2026i3p708-714.html

Flirting With the Grim Reaper: A Commentary on Aging and Faith

Author

Listed:
  • Edwina Pio

Abstract

Age comes a wooing for each of us as we contend with mortality before our encounter with the Grim Reaper. The Grim Reaper is an enduring figure in medieval European Catholicism representing death, usually shown as a skeleton with a dark hood and robe holding a scythe. Black, linked to the black death or plague and black garments at funerals is epitomized in the dark garments of the Grim Reaper whose scythe is a symbol of agriculture, representing the harvesting of souls. Beyond the western Christian tradition, Hine‐nui‐te‐po is the Māori goddess of death, Yama is the Hindu god of death, and Mictecacihuatl is the Aztec queen of the dead, emphasizing how mortality is represented across cultures. A familiar image of death for danger is the ubiquitous skull and crossbones image. Death is an undeniable reality, and confronting mortality often stares one in the face as one gets older, with fears of abandonment and vulnerability. As populations age, organizations grapple with an aging workforce. An estimated 727 million persons were 65+ in 2020 and in 2050, based on better nutrition and medical care, this figure will be 1.5+ billion, with women being the majority. One‐in‐five women 60+ live alone, though there are differences among women from diverse faith groups. An aging gendered workforce stares organizations in the face. How can organizations serve as resource enablers to circumvent and recalibrate structural and symbolic violence against those who fall into the chronobiological marker of age generally 65+ or often 50+, to rearrange different registers of identity? Can organizations recognize wisdom keepers beyond images of doddering dears and wrinkled visages whose attractiveness may have faded in the eye of the organizational beholder? Worker related ageism has several facets which may be implicit or explicit with a plurality of aspects involving stereotypes, and age‐based discrimination in recruitment and employability. Adding to this plurality, the facet of faith and ageism in organizations becomes another delicate aspect to contend with. It is important to stress that the multi‐faceted concepts of aging and faith are both socially and culturally constructed and can be linked to those who are faith adherents as well as those who do not have a specific faith such as atheists, agnostics and those without a faith orientation. In this commentary, the aging–faith–gender nexus in organizations is signposted through four crucial dimensions for exploration and analysis: (1) elderly bodies and work; (2) gendered gerontophobia; (3) mortality and death; and (4) organizational cartographies.

Suggested Citation

  • Edwina Pio, 2026. "Flirting With the Grim Reaper: A Commentary on Aging and Faith," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 708-714, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:3:p:708-714
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.70093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70093
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.70093?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aakanksha Kataria & Satish Kumar & Nitesh Pandey, 2021. "Twenty‐five years of Gender, Work and Organization: A bibliometric analysis," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 85-118, January.
    2. L. Ayu Saraswati, 2017. "The Gender Politics of Human Waste and Human-as-Waste: Indonesian Migrant Workers and Elderly Care in Japan," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(6), pages 594-609, November.
    3. Agnete Meldgaard Hansen & Annette Kamp, 2018. "From Carers to Trainers: Professional Identity and Body Work in Rehabilitative Eldercare," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 63-76, January.
    4. Daniel Holman & Alan Walker, 2021. "Understanding unequal ageing: towards a synthesis of intersectionality and life course analyses," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 239-255, June.
    5. Myra Hamilton & Angela Kintominas & Elizabeth Adamson, 2024. "Childcare by migrant nannies and migrant grannies: A critical discourse analysis of new policy solutions for securing reproductive labor in Australian households," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1290-1311, July.
    6. Edwina Pio & Robert Kilpatrick & Peter Lineham, 2024. "Religious-Spiritual Diversity in Organisations," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 22399.
    7. Katrina Pritchard & Rebecca Whiting, 2022. "Tyred out: Natural aging and aesthetic labor in Pirelli's 2017 calendar," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1562-1577, September.
    8. Jeff Hearn, 2019. "Gender, Work and Organization: A gender–work–organization analysis," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 31-39, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Walsh, Kieran & Carroll, Brídín & O'Shea, Eamon & O'Donovan, Diarmuid, 2024. "Countering social exclusion through inclusive homecare provision: Utilising a participatory life-course approach to influence policy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    2. Loi, Silvia & Tattarini, Giulia & Hale, Jo Mhairi, 2026. "Memory trajectories by migration status and gender: A life-course intersectional perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 391(C).
    3. Bell, Andrew & Evans, Clare & Holman, Dan & Leckie, George, 2024. "Extending intersectional multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (MAIHDA) to study individual longitudinal trajectories, with application to mental health in the UK," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    4. Nil Gulari & Anna Dziuba & Astrid Huopalainen, 2025. "Connecting art, maintenance, and motherhood: How Ukeles's maintenance art shapes understandings of maintenance," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 544-569, March.
    5. Richards, Lindsay & Maharani, Asri & Präg, Patrick, 2026. "Cognitive ageing: sex and life course social class differences in England," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 388(C).
    6. Abdul Kadir Othman & Norreha Othman & Wan Edura Wan Rashid & Shamsul Baharin Saihani & Zaharah Zainal Abidin & Mas Anom Abdul Rashid & Mohd Khirzanbadzli A Rahman & Mohd Ali Bahari Abdul Kadir, 2024. "The Mismatch between Individual Values and Organizational Values among Different Generations in the Workplace," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 16(3), pages 211-218.
    7. María Sánchez-Román & Gadea Autric-Tamayo & Gloria Fernandez-Mayoralas & Fermina Rojo-Perez & María Silveria Agulló-Tomás & Diego Sánchez-González & Vicente Rodriguez-Rodriguez, 2022. "Social Image of Old Age, Gendered Ageism and Inclusive Places: Older People in the Media," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-26, December.
    8. Yinkai Zhang & Yu Guo & Mengting Li & Mengyi Tian, 2025. "Intergenerational Relationship Types and Attitude Toward Retirement: Do Gender and Number of Children Matter?," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 20(2), pages 643-664, April.
    9. Fabian Jintae Froese & Ashish Malik & Satish Kumar & Saumyaranjan Sahoo, 2022. "Asian business and management: review and future directions," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(5), pages 657-689, November.
    10. Julie MacLeavy, 2021. "Care work, gender inequality and technological advancement in the age of COVID‐19," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 138-154, January.
    11. Susan Mayson & Anne Bardoel, 2021. "Sustaining a career in general practice: Embodied work, inequality regimes, and turnover intentions of women working in general practice," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 1133-1151, May.
    12. Debmalya Mukherjee & Saumyaranjan Sahoo & Satish Kumar, 2023. "Two Decades of International Business and International Management Scholarship on Africa: A Review and Future Directions," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 63(6), pages 863-909, December.
    13. Faith Valencia‐Forrester & May Isaac & Gerry O'Leary, 2026. "Inequality, Intersectionality, and In/Visibility of Woman in the Australian Sports Broadcast Technology Industry," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 801-818, May.
    14. Laura Tinner & Daniel Holman & Stephanie Ejegi-Memeh & Anthony A. Laverty, 2023. "Use of Intersectionality Theory in Interventional Health Research in High-Income Countries: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(14), pages 1-20, July.
    15. repec:osf:socarx:jq57s_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Bell, Andrew & Evans, Clare & Holman, Daniel & Leckie, George, 2023. "Extending intersectional Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA) for longitudinal data, with application to mental health trajectories in the UK," SocArXiv jq57s, Center for Open Science.
    17. Julie Ham & Aaron Ceradoy, 2022. "“God blessed me with employers who don't starve their helpers”: Food insecurity and dehumanization in domestic work," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 922-937, May.
    18. Alan Stone & Nicholas Harkiolakis, 2022. "Technology Boom(ers): How US Multinational Technology Companies Are Preparing for an Ageing Workforce," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:3:p:708-714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.