IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v33y2026i3p1065-1081.html

The Devil Wears Nada: Female Employees' Hidden Transcripts and Public Responses to Inessential Esthetic Demands

Author

Listed:
  • Lakshmi Balachandran Nair

Abstract

This study examines how reluctant female employees discuss and respond to the inessential esthetic demands that they receive from their bosses through an anonymous online forum as well as in real‐life work settings. Substudy 1 analyzes the corpus “r/antiwork” to identify the hidden transcripts of employees after inessential esthetic demands. It identifies four discursive practices involved in Reddit threads—“Construction of the ‘Other’,” “Reinstatement of normative views through individualistic rhetoric,” “Rhetoric of choice feminism,” and “Rhetoric of feminist consciousness.” The discourses also include potential responses to the esthetic demands—resistance, compliance or acquiescence, satirical compliance, and malicious compliance. Substudy 2 involves the analysis of a small‐scale survey. The survey confirms the findings of Substudy 1 and also identifies significant relationships between how employees feel when they encounter esthetic demands and how they respond to them. The reasons behind employees' reluctance to report such demands to HR are also detected. This study contributes to the esthetic labor literature by introducing the concept of “inessential esthetic demands,” thereby broadening the field beyond customer‐facing roles, while also advancing understandings of workplace resistance, feminist organizational studies, and gender dynamics in organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Lakshmi Balachandran Nair, 2026. "The Devil Wears Nada: Female Employees' Hidden Transcripts and Public Responses to Inessential Esthetic Demands," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 1065-1081, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:3:p:1065-1081
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.70113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70113
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.70113?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:3:p:1065-1081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.