IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v33y2026i2p545-553.html

Taking Parenthood Seriously: How Parental Status Predicts the Career Trajectories of Women in Politics

Author

Listed:
  • Tevfik Murat Yildirim
  • Hande Eslen‐Ziya

Abstract

There has been renewed interest in the role of parenthood in explaining women's career outcomes in politics. Yet the empirical understanding of how and in what circumstances the parental status of women in legislatures affects their political career is relatively under‐explored. Utilizing an original dataset covering the entire population of Turkish legislators, our study focuses on the tenure duration of those who served in parliament at least once between 1920 and 2023. Our exploratory analyses show that women in parliament tend to have fewer children, compared to men. Results from a series of negative binomial regression models indicate that women's parliamentary career lasts shorter than that of men, especially among legislators with children. Specifically, women with two or more children have significantly shorter parliamentary careers compared to women without children, as well as to men regardless of parental status. Our results lend strong support to studies conceptualizing the parliament as a gendered workplace.

Suggested Citation

  • Tevfik Murat Yildirim & Hande Eslen‐Ziya, 2026. "Taking Parenthood Seriously: How Parental Status Predicts the Career Trajectories of Women in Politics," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 545-553, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:2:p:545-553
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.70061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70061
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.70061?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Josefina Erikson, 2021. "A special fund for gender equality? Institutional constraints and gendered consequences in Swedish collective bargaining," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 1379-1397, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ines Wagner & Mari Teigen, 2022. "Egalitarian inequality: Gender equality and pattern bargaining," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 486-501, March.
    2. Paula Cornejo‐Abarca & Sebastian M. Ugarte & Angel Martin‐Caballero, 2025. "Raising Their Voices Against Patriarchy: The Dynamic Use of Women's Leadership Styles for Progressing Gender Equality in Unions," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 1457-1469, July.
    3. Laust Høgedahl & Christian Lyhne Ibsen & Flemming Ibsen, 2024. "Public sector wage bargaining and the balanced growth model: Denmark and Sweden compared," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 30(1), pages 55-75, March.
    4. Veronika Lemeire & Patrizia Zanoni, 2022. "Beyond methodological nationalism in explanations of gender equality: The impact of EU policies on gender provisions in national collective agreements in Belgium (1957–2020)," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 28(1), pages 47-64, March.
    5. German Bender, 2025. "Challenging the Hypothesis of Neoliberal Convergence in Industrial Relations: The Swedish Conundrum," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 63(4), pages 667-680, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:2:p:545-553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.