IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v33y2026i2p333-349.html

Gender and Success in Getting “Heard”: How Orchestral Programming Choices Promote Women Composers

Author

Listed:
  • Ju Hyun Park
  • Laura E. A. Braden

Abstract

Women composers are significantly underrepresented in classical music. While recent calls for gender equity have prompted some change, symphony orchestras still grapple with balancing canonical male repertoires and inclusive programming. This study examines how symbolic association networks, or networks constructed through programming decisions that group composers together in concert, affect the recognition of women composers. Using data on 1901 composers through 78,018 performances, we employ negative binomial models to show that symbolic network dynamics confer gendered advantages. Gender‐homophilous ties benefit male but not female composers and performances with prestigious composers significantly enhance women composers' visibility. Our findings suggest mixed‐gender programming, where women composers are grouped with canonical male composers, offers a strategic path toward equity without sacrificing traditional canonical repertoires. Throughout the research, we discuss how these results have broader implications for the role gender‐diverse teams play in shaping career and reputational outcomes across professional fields.

Suggested Citation

  • Ju Hyun Park & Laura E. A. Braden, 2026. "Gender and Success in Getting “Heard”: How Orchestral Programming Choices Promote Women Composers," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 333-349, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:2:p:333-349
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.70043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70043
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.70043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:2:p:333-349. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.