IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v33y2026i2p295-299.html

Gender and Digital Platform Work During Turbulent Times

Author

Listed:
  • Melissa E. Langworthy
  • Yana van der Meulen Rodgers

Abstract

This commentary explores how the platform economy shapes labor market responses during times of crisis, with a focus on gendered experiences. Drawing on cases of economic crisis, natural disasters, and refugee displacement, it examines how digital labor platforms offer flexible work opportunities while also reinforcing existing inequalities. Women face distinct constraints—such as caregiving responsibilities, limited mobility, and economic insecurity—that hinder their employment opportunities and earnings potential. These constraints are more pronounced during crises, when access to stable income and safe working conditions becomes more difficult. Although platform work can serve as a lifeline, it is not a guaranteed solution, and its benefits are unevenly distributed. The commentary calls for gender‐responsive policies and new research to understand how digital infrastructures mediate labor experiences across different crisis contexts. Such research can inform inclusive strategies that promote resilience and equity in platform‐based work, particularly for marginalized and displaced populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Melissa E. Langworthy & Yana van der Meulen Rodgers, 2026. "Gender and Digital Platform Work During Turbulent Times," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 295-299, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:2:p:295-299
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.70074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70074
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.70074?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fos, Vyacheslav & Hamdi, Naser & Kalda, Ankit & Nickerson, Jordan, 2025. "Gig labor: Trading safety nets for steering wheels," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    2. Grace Lordan & Jörn‐Steffen Pischke, 2022. "Does Rosie Like Riveting? Male and Female Occupational Choices," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 89(353), pages 110-130, January.
    3. George Maier & Kate R. Gilchrist, 2022. "Women who host: An intersectional critique of rentier capitalism on AirBnB," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 817-829, May.
    4. Cody Cook & Rebecca Diamond & Jonathan V Hall & John A List & Paul Oyer, 2021. "The Gender Earnings Gap in the Gig Economy: Evidence from over a Million Rideshare Drivers," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 88(5), pages 2210-2238.
    5. Niels van Doorn & Fabian Ferrari & Mark Graham, 2023. "Migration and Migrant Labour in the Gig Economy: An Intervention," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(4), pages 1099-1111, August.
    6. Datta, Namita & Rong, Chen & Singh, Sunamika & Stinshoff, Clara & Iacob, Nadina & Nigatu, Natnael Simachew & Nxumalo, Mpumelelo & Klimaviciute, Luka, 2023. "Working Without Borders: The Promise and Peril of Online Gig Work," Jobs Group Papers, Notes, and Guides 32573393, The World Bank.
    7. Gilchrist, Kate & Maier, George, 2022. "Women who host: an intersectional critique of rentier capitalism on AirBnB," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113677, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joseph Mellors & Valerie Egdell, 2025. "Affected and Intrinsic Authenticity: Navigating Internalized Gay Ageism on LGBTQ+ Homestay Platforms," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 1569-1579, July.
    2. Jack Fisher, 2024. "Monopsony Power in the Gig Economy," CESifo Working Paper Series 11444, CESifo.
    3. Xiaoyue Shan & Ulf Zölitz & Uschi Backes-Gellner, 2025. "Disconnecting Women: Gender Disparities in the Impact of Online Instruction," CESifo Working Paper Series 11997, CESifo.
    4. Nobel Prize Committee, 2023. "Scientific Background to the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2023," Nobel Prize in Economics documents 2023-2, Nobel Prize Committee.
    5. Zhang, Zhijie & Zong, Qingqing, 2025. "Women's empowerment and participation in innovation: Evidence from the one-child policy in China," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(10).
    6. Josep Amer-Mestre and Agnès Charpin, 2022. "Gender Differences in Early Occupational Choices: Evidence from Medical Specialty Selection," Economics Working Papers EUI ECO 2022/01, European University Institute.
    7. Nicola Rosaia, 2025. "Competing Platforms and Transport Equilibrium," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 93(6), pages 2235-2271, November.
    8. Chadi, Adrian & Hetschko, Clemens, 2025. "Income or leisure? On the hidden benefits of (un)employment," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    9. Julian Kolev & Yuly Fuentes-Medel & Fiona Murray, 2019. "Is Blinded Review Enough? How Gendered Outcomes Arise Even Under Anonymous Evaluation," NBER Working Papers 25759, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Chen, Xinwei & Wang, Tong & Thomas, Barrett W. & Ulmer, Marlin W., 2023. "Same-day delivery with fair customer service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(2), pages 738-751.
    11. Graham, Mark & Alyanak, Oğuz & Bertolini, Alessio & Feuerstein, Patrick & Kuttler, Tobias & Ustek Spilda, Funda & Valente, Jonas, 2025. "Pressure and praise as an action research methodology: The case of Fairwork," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue OnlineFir, pages 1-15.
    12. Yiwei Qian & Naveen Sunder & Adnan M. S. Fakir & Rakesh Banerjee & Tushar Bharati, 2023. "Gender Differences in Preference for Non-pecuniary Benefits in the Labour Market. Experimental Evidence from an Online Freelancing Platform," Working Paper Series 0723, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.
    13. Nikolaos Theodoropoulos & John Forth & Alex Bryson, 2019. "Are Women Doing It For Themselves? Gender Segregation and the Gender Wage Gap," DoQSS Working Papers 19-07, Quantitative Social Science - UCL Social Research Institute, University College London.
    14. Yuan, Gecheng & Lu, Weijie & Wu, Xinyi & Zhou, Li, 2025. "The gig economy and household financial vulnerability," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(PB).
    15. Shiya Wang & Adina Sterling, 2025. "Setting Up the Gap? Gender Differences in Initial Salary Offers in Hiring," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 2399-2415, November.
    16. David Dorn & Florian Schoner & Moritz Seebacher & Lisa Simon & Ludger Woessmann, 2024. "Multidimensional Skills on LinkedIn Profiles: Measuring Human Capital and the Gender Skill Gap," Papers 2409.18638, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    17. Chen Liang & Yili Hong & Bin Gu & Jing Peng, 2018. "Gender Wage Gap in Online Gig Economy and Gender Differences in Job Preferences," Working Papers 18-03, NET Institute.
    18. Benjamin Lochner & Christian Merkl, 2026. "Gender-Specific Application Behaviour, Matching, and the Residual Gender Earnings Gap," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 136(673), pages 97-124.
    19. Shulamit Kahn & Donna Ginther, 2017. "Women and STEM," NBER Working Papers 23525, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. José-Ignacio Antón & Rafael Grande & Rafael Muñoz de Bustillo & Fernando Pinto, 2023. "Gender Gaps in Working Conditions," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 53-83, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:2:p:295-299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.