IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v33y2026i1p80-90.html

Contesting Nursing: Gig Care Workers and Their Helper Script

Author

Listed:
  • Chia Yu Lien

Abstract

Why have so many care workers left formal wage employment for gig work since the beginning of the COVID‐19 pandemic? What promise do they see in gig care work, and what precarity? Drawing on interviews with care workers and managers in U.S. nursing homes, this article explores gig care at the point of production. Gig work, by facilitating easy exits from poor working conditions, carves out a social space for crafting what I term the “helper script”: a set of speech acts that emphasize workers' status as helpers rather than staff to counteract caregiving exploitation. Care work differs from other types of work in that its resistance is under closer ethical scrutiny and requires more justification. By framing themselves as only present to help, gig workers simultaneously uphold dominant care ethics imposed on staff employees while exempting themselves from it. In practice, care workers use the helper script to subvert the aspects of care work that often demand their time, emotions, and relationships. Although some gig care workers express a sense of precarity, none want to return to regular employment; they would rather creatively maneuver their way out of the precarity within the gig than leave it.

Suggested Citation

  • Chia Yu Lien, 2026. "Contesting Nursing: Gig Care Workers and Their Helper Script," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 80-90, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:1:p:80-90
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.70035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70035
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.70035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:1:p:80-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.