IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v33y2026i1p67-79.html

Sexual Harassment as Reification: #MeToo in the Cultural and Creative Industries in Sweden

Author

Listed:
  • Karin Hansson
  • Hillevi Ganetz
  • Malin Sveningsson

Abstract

In this article, drawing on 20 interviews with participants in the #MeToo petitions #deadline and #konstnärligfrihet [artistic freedom], we explore the significance of sexual harassment in Sweden's cultural and creative industries. Our findings demonstrate how sexual harassment serves as a particularly effective tool of oppression in precarious work situations where individuals rely on informal social networks to secure work. To obtain and sustain work in this environment, an individual must gain recognition as an important—preferably indispensable—part of this social fabric. These dynamics can be understood through a bodily ontology of vulnerability, where vulnerability serves both as the emotional glue holding these networks together and as a source of anxiety, as inclusion depends on the validation of others. Another distinctive aspect of these contexts is the commodification of vulnerability within the professional role, as the value being exchanged is largely tied to the individual's perceived brilliance. Under these working conditions, sexual harassment functions as a form of reification, damaging relationships within the network while simultaneously diminishing the value of participants’ “genius.” #MeToo activism served as a means of resisting the reification process by recognizing a collective vulnerability.

Suggested Citation

  • Karin Hansson & Hillevi Ganetz & Malin Sveningsson, 2026. "Sexual Harassment as Reification: #MeToo in the Cultural and Creative Industries in Sweden," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 67-79, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:1:p:67-79
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.70028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70028
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.70028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:1:p:67-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.