IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v33y2026i1p261-276.html

From the Ideal Worker to the Inclusive Worker: Measuring Norm Shifts Within Occupational Contexts

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Müller
  • Heejung Chung

Abstract

Research shows that the ideal worker norm—the masculine‐gendered expectation of unlimited work devotion—perpetuates class and gender inequality, increases turnover rates, and negatively affects job satisfaction and work–life balance. Occupational research typically measures this norm through the share of employees working full‐time or long hours. We advocate for a more comprehensive approach by (1) extracting employers' normative expectations from job adverts using machine learning, (2) separately quantifying the masculine‐centric nature of this norm, and (3) tracing the norm's occupation‐specific evolution. Further, we introduce the inclusive worker norm to juxtapose against the ideal worker norm. We demonstrate the inclusion of these diverse aspects at the occupational level, employing multi‐level factor analyses to evaluate supply‐ and demand‐side data for Switzerland, from 2001 to 2023. The validity of our indicators is supported by (1) factor analysis fit measures, (2) positive correlation with established indicators and part‐time and gender pay gaps, and (3) negative associations with preferences for part‐time work as estimated by multi‐level models. By adopting this nuanced, occupation‐specific, and historical lens, and leveraging job advert data, our research provides a novel approach to better analyze, understand, and address gender inequalities, and other work outcomes, perpetuated or mitigated by (shifts in) the ideal worker and inclusive worker norms.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Müller & Heejung Chung, 2026. "From the Ideal Worker to the Inclusive Worker: Measuring Norm Shifts Within Occupational Contexts," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 261-276, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:1:p:261-276
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.70038
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70038
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.70038?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maike Damme & Dimitris Pavlopoulos, 2022. "Gender Ideology in Europe: Plotting Normative Types in a Multidimensional Space," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 861-891, November.
    2. Andrew Bell & Malcolm Fairbrother & Kelvyn Jones, 2019. "Fixed and random effects models: making an informed choice," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 1051-1074, March.
    3. Deaton, Angus, 1985. "Panel data from time series of cross-sections," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1-2), pages 109-126.
    4. Adcock, Robert & Collier, David, 2001. "Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 95(3), pages 529-546, September.
    5. Melissa Mazmanian & Wanda J. Orlikowski & JoAnne Yates, 2013. "The Autonomy Paradox: The Implications of Mobile Email Devices for Knowledge Professionals," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1337-1357, October.
    6. Claudia Goldin, 2014. "A Grand Gender Convergence: Its Last Chapter," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(4), pages 1091-1119, April.
    7. Heejung Chung & Hyojin Seo, 2024. "Flexibility Stigma Across Europe: How National Contexts can Shift the Extent to which Flexible Workers are Stigmatised," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 174(3), pages 945-965, September.
    8. Mona Zanhour & Dana McDaniel Sumpter, 2024. "The entrenchment of the ideal worker norm during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Evidence from working mothers in the United States," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 625-643, March.
    9. Heejung Chung, 2020. "Gender, Flexibility Stigma and the Perceived Negative Consequences of Flexible Working in the UK," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 151(2), pages 521-545, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lucie Noury & Stéphan Pezé & Sébastien Gand, 2026. ""Consultants Who Pick Up Their Children Every Day Don't Exist": How Professionals Experience Conflicting Norms Through Successive Gendered Trials," Post-Print hal-05539480, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Smyk, Magdalena & Velde, Lucas van der & Tyrowicz, Joanna, . "Premia za pełną dyspozycyjność. Eksperyment winietkowy dotyczący organizacji czasu pracy," Gospodarka Narodowa-The Polish Journal of Economics, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie / SGH Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 2025(2).
    2. Magdalena Smyk & Lucas van der Velde & Joanna Tyrowicz, 2025. "Paying for Ideal Discretion: A Framed Field Experiment on Working Time Arrangements," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 2, pages 1-28.
    3. Senhu Wang & Heejung Chung, 2026. "Revisiting Flexibility Stigma: How Framing Remote Working Shapes Bias Against Remote Workers," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 1227-1244, July.
    4. Lucie Noury & Stéphan Pezé & Sébastien Gand, 2026. ""Consultants Who Pick Up Their Children Every Day Don't Exist": How Professionals Experience Conflicting Norms Through Successive Gendered Trials," Post-Print hal-05539480, HAL.
    5. Mayuri Chaturvedi, 2022. "Schooling Down to Marry Up: Marriage Norms and Educational Investments," Working Papers 202216, University of Liverpool, Department of Economics.
    6. Craig A. Depken & Tomislav Globan, 2025. "Women's international football success and women's economic freedom," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 43(4), pages 714-730, October.
    7. Jolene Tan & Jeremy Lim-Soh & Poh Lin Tan, 2024. "The Impact of Teleworking on Women’s Work–Life Balance and Life Satisfaction: a Longitudinal Study from Singapore," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 19(5), pages 2595-2615, October.
    8. Lucie Noury & Stéphan Pezé & Sébastien Gand, 2026. "“Consultants Who Pick Up Their Children Every Day Don't Exist”: How Professionals Experience Conflicting Norms Through Successive Gendered Trials," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 1310-1326, July.
    9. Henrik Kleven & Camille Landais & Gabriel Leite-Mariante, 2025. "The Child Penalty Atlas," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 92(5), pages 3174-3207.
    10. Lauren Ryan & Brendan Churchill & Leah Ruppanner, 2026. "The Gendered Flexibility Paradox and Remote-First Work: How Working Parents Reconcile Work and Care," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 40(2), pages 203-224, April.
    11. Viete, Steffen & Erdsiek, Daniel, 2018. "Trust-based work time and the productivity effects of mobile information technologies in the workplace," ZEW Discussion Papers 18-013, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    12. Aljoscha Jacobi & Maik Hamjediers & Tabea Naujoks, 2025. "Tailored to Women, Provided to Men? Gendered Occupational Inequality in Access to Flexible Working-Time Arrangements," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 176(3), pages 1179-1205, February.
    13. Cherise Regier, 2026. "Who Benefits From Right‐to‐Disconnect Legislation in Europe? Cross‐National and Gendered Effects on Employee Wellbeing," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 64(2), pages 323-340, June.
    14. Cha, Youngjoo & Hipp, Lena & Cho, Soocheol, 2026. "Competing devotions in the postpandemic economy: the effect of remote working on perceptions of employees as “good workers” and “good parents” in Germany, South Korea, and the United States," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Advance a, pages 1-24.
    15. Vanessa Conzon & Ruthanne Huising, 2024. "Devoted but Disconnected : Managing Role Conflict Through Interactional Control," Post-Print hal-04553331, HAL.
    16. Filippos Maraziotis, 2024. "Flexibility for equality: Examining the impact of flexible working time arrangements on women's convergence in working hours," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 62(2), pages 410-445, June.
    17. Maciej Albinowski, 2026. "What explains the East-West gap in part-time employment in Europe?," IBS Working Papers 01/2026, Instytut Badan Strukturalnych.
    18. Heejung Chung & Mariska van der Horst, 2020. "Flexible Working and Unpaid Overtime in the UK: The Role of Gender, Parental and Occupational Status," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 151(2), pages 495-520, September.
    19. Denly, Michael & Helms, Benjamin, 2025. "A Report on "Corruption and Co-optation in Autocracy: Evidence from Russia"," I4R Discussion Paper Series 260, The Institute for Replication (I4R).
    20. Mejia, Paula & Meléndez Arjona, Marcela, 2012. "Middle-Class Entrepreneurs and Social Mobility through Entrepreneurship in Colombia," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 4082, Inter-American Development Bank.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:33:y:2026:i:1:p:261-276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.