IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v32y2025i6p2308-2321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Elites of the Whorearchy—OnlyFans Creators’ Power, Identity and Sex Work Stigma Negotiation

Author

Listed:
  • Swana Schuchmann

Abstract

Despite the rapid expansion of the digital sex industry, little is known about how digital sex workers navigate identity and stigma, particularly in the German context. This study examines how German female OnlyFans creators (aged 21–28) construct and maintain positive social identities amid societal stigma and hierarchical divisions within the sex work industry. Drawing on five semi‐structured interviews and applying Social Identity Theory (Tajfel and Turner 2004 [1986]) and stigma management strategies in dirty work (Ashforth and Kreiner 1999), the findings reveal four key strategies: (1) social buffer networks, (2) passing and strategic ambiguity to conceal one’s profession, (3) reframing work in alignment with personal values, and (4) social weighting (Ashforth and Kreiner 1999). This study extends the dirty work framework and whorearchy (see Toubiana and Ruebottom 2022) concept to digital sex work, illustrating how platform affordances, sex work mainstreaming (Brents and Sanders 2010), and the rise of supplementary erotic gig labor in neoliberal capitalism shape stigma management strategies and identity construction.

Suggested Citation

  • Swana Schuchmann, 2025. "Elites of the Whorearchy—OnlyFans Creators’ Power, Identity and Sex Work Stigma Negotiation," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(6), pages 2308-2321, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:32:y:2025:i:6:p:2308-2321
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.70010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70010
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.70010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:32:y:2025:i:6:p:2308-2321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.